Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 21;13(3):e068138.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068138.

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for studies on centralisation of healthcare services

Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise  1 , Julia Scharfe  1 , Charlotte Mareike Kugler  1 , Eni Shehu  1 , Tobias Wolf  1 , Tim Mathes  2 , Dawid Pieper  3
Affiliations

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for studies on centralisation of healthcare services

Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Centralisation defined as the reorganisation of healthcare services into fewer specialised units serving a higher volume of patients is a potential measure for healthcare reforms aiming at reducing costs while improving quality. Research on centralisation of healthcare services is thus essential to inform decision-makers. However, so far studies on centralisation report a variability of outcomes, often neglecting outcomes at the health system level. Therefore, this study aims at developing a core outcome set (COS) for studies on centralisation of hospital procedures, which is intended for use in observational as well as in experimental studies.

Methods and analysis: We propose a five-stage study design: (1) systematic review, (2) focus group, (3) interview studies, (4) online survey, (5) Delphi survey. The study will be conducted from March 2022 to November 2023. First, an initial list of outcomes will be identified through a systematic review on reported outcomes in studies on minimum volume regulations. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINHAL, EconLIT, PDQ-Evidence for Informed Health Policymaking, Health Systems Evidence, Open Grey and also trial registries. This will be supplemented with relevant outcomes from published studies on centralisation of hospital procedures. Second, we will conduct a focus group with representatives of patient advocacy groups for which minimum volume regulations are currently in effect in Germany or are likely to come into effect to identify outcomes important to patients. Furthermore, two interview studies, one with representatives of the German medical societies and one with representatives of statutory health insurance funds, as well as an online survey with health services researchers will be conducted. In our analyses of the suggested outcomes, we will largely follow the categorisation scheme developed by the Cochrane EPOC group. Finally, a two-round online Delphi survey with all stakeholder groups using predefined score criteria for consensus will be employed to first prioritise outcomes and then agree on the final COS.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB). The final COS will be disseminated to all stakeholders involved and through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

Keywords: Organisation of health services; PRIMARY CARE; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development of a core outcome set for studies on centralisation of healthcare services.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Slawomirski L, Auraaen A, Klazinga NS. The economocs of patient safety: strenghtening a value-based approach to reducing patient harm at national level. OECD Health Working Papers 2018:96.
    1. Imison C, et al. . The reconfiguration of clinical services what is the evidence? London: The King’s Fund, 2014.
    1. Bhattarai N, McMeekin P, Price C, et al. . Economic evaluations on centralisation of specialised healthcare services: a systematic review of methods. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011214. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011214 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res 1987;22:157–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morche J, Mathes T, Pieper D. Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:204.:204. 10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources