Long-term outcomes of dual vs single HER2-directed neoadjuvant therapy in NSABP B-41
- PMID: 36944848
- PMCID: PMC11225589
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06881-8
Long-term outcomes of dual vs single HER2-directed neoadjuvant therapy in NSABP B-41
Abstract
Background: The primary aim of this randomized neoadjuvant trial in operable, HER2-positive breast cancer, was to determine the efficacy on pathologic complete response (pCR) of substituting lapatinib (L) for trastuzumab (T) or adding L to T, in combination with weekly paclitaxel (WP) following AC. Results on pCR were previously reported. Here, we report data on planned secondary endpoints, recurrence-free interval (RFI) post-surgery, and overall survival (OS).
Methods: All patients received standard AC q3 weeks × 4 cycles followed by WP (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15, q28 days × 4 cycles. Concurrently with WP, patients received either T (4 mg/kg load, then 2 mg/kg) weekly until surgery, L (1250 mg) daily until surgery, or weekly T plus L (750 mg) daily until surgery. Following surgery, all patients received T to complete 52 weeks of HER2-targeted therapy. 522 of 529 randomized patients had follow-up. Median follow-up was 5.1 years.
Results: RFI at 4.5 years was 87.2%, 79.4% (p = 0.34; HR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.80, 2.34), and 89.4% (p = 0.37; HR = 0.70; 0.37, 1.32) for arms T, L, and TL, respectively. The corresponding five-year OS was 94.8%, 89.1% (p = 0.34; HR = 1.46; 0.68, 3.11), and 95.8% (p = 0.25; HR = 0.58; 0.22, 1.51), respectively. Patients with pCR had a much better prognosis, especially in the ER-negative cohort: RFI (HR = 0.23, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.28, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Although pCR, RFI, and OS were numerically better with the dual combination and less with L, the differences were not statistically significant. However, achievement of pCR again correlated with improved outcomes, especially remarkable in the ER-negative subset.
Clinical trials registration: NCT00486668.
Keywords: HER2-positive breast cancer; HER2-targeted therapy; Lapatinib; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Trastuzumab.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
SH: Research funding for unrelated projects from Pfizer and Exact Sciences; Honorary Fees from Exact Sciences and Merck for Advisory Board meetings. CEG, Jr: Abbvie: Contracted Research (Terminated, Jul 1, 2022), Writing assistance (Terminated, Jul 1, 2022); AstraZeneca: Contracted Research (Ongoing), Writing assistance (Ongoing); Daiichi/Sankyo: Contracted Research (Ongoing); Exact Sciences: Consulting Fees (e.g., advisory boards) (Ongoing); F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Contracted Research (Ongoing); Genentech: Contracted Research (Ongoing), Writing assistance (Ongoing) HDB: Non-relevant disclosures: Talks/honoraria, Genentech. J-FB: Honoraria/speaker’s fee: Roche, Exact Sciences, Merck, AstraZeneca; Advisory boards or speakers’ bureaus: Pfizer, Novartis, Merck. AstraZeneca, Lilly, Roche; Funded grants or clinical trials: Institutional PI, clinical trial: Roche, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca (also Steering Committee). AMB: Consultant for Astra-Zeneca, Roche, Puma, Seattle Genetics, Macrogenics, Daiichi Sankyo. SMS: Grants/contracts: Genentech/Roche, Kailos Genetics, BCRF; Consulting fees: Roche/Genentech, Molecular Therapeutics; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events: Genentech/Roche, Daiichi Sankyo; Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Genentech/Roche travel to Boston 11/2019; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: DSMB AstraZeneca; Ad Board: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Biotheranostics, Natera, Merck, Silverback Therapeutics, Athenex, Lilly; Scientific Advisory Board: Inivata. Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid: NSABP Vice chairman; CCF, ASCO Director; Receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services: Third-party writing: Genentech/Roche and AstraZeneca. EPM: Genentech/Roche, Exact Sciences, Merck: Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau; Biotheranostics, Puma Biotechnology, Agendia, AstraZeneca: Consultant. All other authors have no other potential COIs to report.
Declarations
Figures
References
-
- Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V et al. (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 375:377–384. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61964-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Burris HA 3rd, Hurwitz HI, Dees EC et al. (2005) Phase I safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity study of lapatinib (GW572016), a reversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 23:5305–5313. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2005.16.584 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blackwell K, Kaplan E, Franco S et al. (2004) A phase II, open-label, multicenter study of lapatinib (GW572016) in patients with metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab-containing regimens. Ann Oncol 15:27. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a000353 - DOI
-
- Burstein H, Storniolo AM, Franco S et al. (2004) A phase II, open-label, multicenter study of lapatinib in two cohorts of patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have progressed while receiving trastuzumab-containing regimens. Ann Oncol 15:27. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a000353 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
