Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Oct;15(5):511-28.
doi: 10.1007/BF01061760.

Estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters and performance of Bayesian feedback: a sensitivity analysis

Affiliations

Estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters and performance of Bayesian feedback: a sensitivity analysis

S Vozeh et al. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987 Oct.

Abstract

We investigated the influence of bias in the estimates of the population pharmacokinetic parameters on the performance of Bayesian feedback in achieving a desired drug serum concentration. Three specific cases were considered (i) steady-state case, (ii) lidocaine example, and (iii) mexiletine example. Whereas in the first case both the feedback and the desired concentration represented steady-state values, in the lidocaine and mexiletine examples the feedback concentration was assumed to be sampled shortly after starting therapy. RMSE was used as a measure of predictive performance. For the simple steady-state case the relationship between RMSE and bias in the parameter estimates describing the prior distribution could be derived analytically. Monte Carlo simulations were used to explore the two non-steady-state situations. In general, the performance of Bayesian feedback to predict serum concentrations was relatively insensitive to bad population parameter estimates. However, large changes in RMSE could be observed with small changes in the true variance component parameters in particular in the intraindividual residual variance, sigma 2 epsilon, indicating that the prediction interval, in contrast to point prediction, is sensitive to bias in the estimates of the population parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Mar;37(3):349-57 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982 Sep;32(3):378-86 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1985 Nov-Dec;10(6):457-76 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1984 Nov-Dec;9(6):545-54 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 Sep;26(3):294-305 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources