Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 21;16(1):49.
doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00550-3.

Interprofessional collaboration within general practice teams following the inclusion of non-dispensing pharmacists

Thilini Sudeshika  1   2 , Louise S Deeks  3 , Mark Naunton  3 , Gregory M Peterson  3   4 , Sam Kosari  3
Affiliations

Interprofessional collaboration within general practice teams following the inclusion of non-dispensing pharmacists

Thilini Sudeshika et al. J Pharm Policy Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists have been included in general practice teams to provide non-dispensing services in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) since 2016. Interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness are key considerations in providing high-quality patient care. These concepts have not been well studied following the inclusion of a pharmacist in general practice teams.

Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted to explore collaboration between pharmacists and health professionals in eight general practices in the ACT, where pharmacists were included in their teams. A validated survey instrument was adapted and utilised to assess the changes in interprofessional collaboration over time following the addition of a pharmacist. Another validated survey was utilised to explore team effectiveness at the end of the study. Semi-structured interviews, with a thematic analysis, were conducted with a purposeful sample of general practice staff members to understand the factors influencing the development of interprofessional collaboration.

Results: In total, 56 and 41 participants completed the baseline and follow-up survey, including 26 who completed both surveys to assess the change in collaboration over time. Interprofessional collaboration scores were high initially and did not change over time. Team effectiveness was also high at the end of the study. Twenty-one individuals participated in interviews, which generated four main interrelated themes related to interprofessional collaboration: professional working relationships, trust, commitment to collaboration, and barriers to collaboration. Trust was integral to professional working relationships and commitment to collaboration. The barriers to collaboration included not having a role description for pharmacists, inadequate interest to initiate working relationships, lack of dedicated time for interaction, lack of utilisation, and poor awareness of pharmacist-led activities in general practice.

Conclusion: Interprofessional collaboration was initially high and not influenced by the addition of a pharmacist, perhaps reflecting the inherent nature of the general practices willing to include a pharmacist within their team. Introducing a clear job description for pharmacists, and dedicating time to interact with pharmacists, could be beneficial in improving trust and professional working relationships and enhancing collaboration between the pharmacists and other general practice team members.

Keywords: Barriers; General practice pharmacist; Interprofessional collaboration; Professional working relationships; Team effectiveness; Trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mixed methods integration flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Factors influencing the development of collaboration between pharmacists and other general practice team members
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson C, Zhan K, Boyd M, Mann C. The role of pharmacists in general practice: A realist review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(4):338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hazen ACM, Zwart DLM, Poldervaart JM, et al. Non-dispensing pharmacists' actions and solutions of drug therapy problems among elderly polypharmacy patients in primary care. Fam Pract. 2019;36(5):544–551. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khaira M, Mathers A, Benny Gerard N, Dolovich L. The evolving role and impact of integrating pharmacists into primary care teams: experience from Ontario, Canada. Pharmacy (Basel) 2020;8(4):234. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040234. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardwell K, Smith SM, Clyne B, et al. Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e035087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sudeshika T, Naunton M, Deeks LS, Thomas J, Peterson GM, Kosari S. General practice pharmacists in Australia: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0258674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258674. - DOI - PMC - PubMed