Heterogeneity of surrogate outcome measures used in critical care studies: A systematic review
- PMID: 36946422
- PMCID: PMC10617004
- DOI: 10.1177/17407745231151842
Heterogeneity of surrogate outcome measures used in critical care studies: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: The choice of outcome measure is a critical decision in the design of any clinical trial, but many Phase III clinical trials in critical care fail to detect a difference between the interventions being compared. This may be because the surrogate outcomes used to show beneficial effects in early phase trials (which informed the design of the subsequent Phase III trials) are not valid guides to the differences between the interventions for the main outcomes of the Phase III trials. We undertook a systematic review (1) to generate a list of outcome measures used in critical care trials, (2) to determine the variability in the outcome reporting in the respiratory subgroup and (3) to create a smaller list of potential early phase endpoints in the respiratory subgroup.
Methods: Data related to outcomes were extracted from studies published in the six top-ranked critical care journals between 2010 and 2020. Outcomes were classified into subcategories and categories. A subset of early phase endpoints relevant to the respiratory subgroup was selected for further investigation. The variability of the outcomes and the variability in reporting was investigated.
Results: A total of 6905 references were retrieved and a total of 294 separate outcomes were identified from 58 studies. The outcomes were then classified into 11 categories and 66 subcategories. A subset of 22 outcomes relevant for the respiratory group were identified as potential early phase outcomes. The summary statistics, time points and definitions show the outcomes are analysed and reported in different ways.
Conclusion: The outcome measures were defined, analysed and reported in a variety of ways. This creates difficulties for synthesising data in systematic reviews and planning definitive trials. This review once again highlights an urgent need for standardisation and validation of surrogate outcomes reported in critical care trials. Future work should aim to validate and develop a core outcome set for surrogate outcomes in critical care trials.
Keywords: Clinical trials; critical care; outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.pub2. PMID: 11687058 Updated.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
Cited by
-
Predictions With a Purpose: Elevating Standards for Clinical Modeling Research.Crit Care Explor. 2025 May 27;7(6):e1268. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001268. eCollection 2025 Jun 1. Crit Care Explor. 2025. PMID: 40434887 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Definitions of digital biomarkers: a systematic mapping of the biomedical literature.BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Apr 8;31(1):e100914. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100914. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024. PMID: 38589213 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 69(3): 89–95. - PubMed
-
- Ruskin JN. The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST). The New England J Med 1989; 321 (6): 386–388. - PubMed
-
- Greene HL, Roden DM, Katz RJ, et al.. The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial: first CAST… then CAST-II. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19(5): 894–898. - PubMed
-
- Epstein AE, Bigger JT, Jr, Wyse DG, et al.. Events in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST): mortality in the entire population enrolled. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18(1): 14–19. - PubMed
-
- Bakker J, Grover R, McLuckie A, et al.. Administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-methyl-L-arginine hydrochloride (546C88) by intravenous infusion for up to 72 hours can promote the resolution of shock in patients with severe sepsis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study (study no. 144-002). Crit Care Med 2004; 32(1): 1–12. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical