An evidence-based evaluation of left ventricular thrombus treatment, outcomes, and resolution: a systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36951736
- DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001230
An evidence-based evaluation of left ventricular thrombus treatment, outcomes, and resolution: a systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis
Abstract
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a recognized complication of acute myocardial infarction which is associated with stroke. There has yet to be a published systematic review that focuses on outcomes for patients with LVT. We conducted a systematic review on treatments, adverse events and thrombus resolution in patients with LVT. Meta-analysis and numerical pooling were used to evaluate the difference in outcomes based on treatment and the presence or absence of LVT. A total of 39 studies were included (5475 patients with LVT and 356 589 patients with no LVT). The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with reduced mortality [RR, 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.97; I2 = 9%] and bleeding (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.85; I2 = 0%) compared to warfarin but there was a nonsignificant reduction in stroke/embolic events (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.19; I2 = 3%). For patients with any treatment, the rate of stroke/embolic events, bleeding and mortality at follow-up of up to 12 months was 6.4, 3.7 and 7.9%, respectively. Pooled results from six studies that evaluated resolution at 6 months suggest that 80% of LVT were resolved. Apixaban was associated with the highest rate of (93.3%) whereas warfarin exhibited the lowest rate of resolution 73.1%. LVT is best managed with DOAC compared to warfarin therapy. An individualized approach to antithrombotic therapy is warranted as there appears to be no duration of therapy that clearly results in the resolution of all cases of LVT so follow-up imaging after discontinuation of anticoagulant is needed.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Treatment and outcomes in patients with left ventricular thrombus - experiences from the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi - Kenya.Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 23;39:212. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.212.28585. eCollection 2021. Pan Afr Med J. 2021. PMID: 34630824 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in left ventricular thrombus.ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):3519-3532. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14084. Epub 2022 Jul 27. ESC Heart Fail. 2022. PMID: 35894752 Free PMC article.
-
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):935-940. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001270. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35383658 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2022;20(6):517-526. doi: 10.2174/1570161120666221003104821. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36200193
-
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Ther. 2021 Apr 7;28(4):e411-e419. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001351. Am J Ther. 2021. PMID: 33852473
Cited by
-
Stroke and Recent Myocardial Infarction, Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Left Ventricular Thrombus, and Wall Motion Abnormalities.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Dec;25(12):1687-1697. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-02009-y. Epub 2023 Dec 11. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 38079058 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin in Acute Left Ventricular Thrombus Following Myocardial Infarction: RIVAWAR, An Open-Label RCT.JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 23;4(8):101978. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101978. Online ahead of print. JACC Adv. 2025. PMID: 40706143 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of left ventricular thrombus on serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jan 31;26(2):349-358. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae271. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39437323
-
Cerebral infarction and in-hospital mortality for patients admitted to hospital with intracardiac thrombus: insights from the National Inpatient Sample.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Aug;56(2):342-350. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02824-8. Epub 2023 Jun 5. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023. PMID: 37277607
References
-
- McCarthy CP, Vaduganathan M, McCarthy KJ, Januzzi JL, Bhatt DL, McEvoy JW. Left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol 2018; 3:642–649.
-
- Camaj A, Fuster V, Giustino G, Bienstock SW, Sternheim D, Mehran R, et al. Left ventricular thrombus following acute myocardial infarction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:1010–1022.
-
- Massussi M, Scotti A, Lip GYH, Proietti R. Left ventricular thrombosis: new perspectives on an old problem. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2021; 7:158–167.
-
- Levine GN, McEvoy JW, Fang JC, Ibeh C, McCarthy CP, Misra A, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Stroke Council. Management of patients at risk for and with left ventricular thrombus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022; 146:e205–e223.
-
- Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. JAMA 2000; 283:2008–2012.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical