Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 23:8:e40272.
doi: 10.2196/40272.

Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis

Affiliations

Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis

Stephanie A Robinson et al. JMIR Diabetes. .

Abstract

Background: Secure messaging use is associated with improved diabetes-related outcomes. However, it is less clear how secure messaging supports diabetes management.

Objective: We examined secure message topics between patients and clinical team members in a national sample of veterans with type 2 diabetes to understand use of secure messaging for diabetes management and potential associations with glycemic control.

Methods: We surveyed and analyzed the content of secure messages between 448 US Veterans Health Administration patients with type 2 diabetes and their clinical teams. We also explored the relationship between secure messaging content and glycemic control.

Results: Explicit diabetes-related content was the most frequent topic (72.1% of participants), followed by blood pressure (31.7% of participants). Among diabetes-related conversations, 90.7% of patients discussed medication renewals or refills. More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 or more threads about blood pressure compared to those with poor control (37.5% vs 27.2%, P=.02). More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 more threads intended to share information with their clinical team about an aspect of their diabetes management compared to those with poor control (23.7% vs 12.4%, P=.009).

Conclusions: There were few differences in secure messaging topics between patients in good versus poor glycemic control. Those in good control were more likely to engage in informational messages to their team and send messages related to blood pressure. It may be that the specific topic content of the secure messages may not be that important for glycemic control. Simply making it easier for patients to communicate with their clinical teams may be the driving influence between associations previously reported in the literature between secure messaging and positive clinical outcomes in diabetes.

Keywords: T2D; communication; diabetes; diabetic control; disease outcomes; engagement; glycemic control; health information; management; message content; messaging; patient portal; patient-provider communication; secure messaging; support; veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services. [2023-02-28]. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html .
    1. Liu Y, Sayam S, Shao X, Wang K, Zheng S, Li Y, Wang L. Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among veterans, United States, 2005-2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Dec 14;14:E135. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170230. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29240552 E135 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roglic G. WHO Global report on diabetes: A summary. Int J Non-Commun Dis. 2016;1(1):3. doi: 10.4103/2468-8827.184853. - DOI
    1. American Diabetes Association Standard of primary care in diabetes-2020. Abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2020 Jan;38(1):10–38. doi: 10.2337/cd20-as01. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31975748 10 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson SA, Zocchi MS, Netherton D, Ash A, Purington CM, Connolly SL, Vimalananda VG, Hogan TP, Shimada SL. Secure messaging, diabetes self-management, and the importance of patient autonomy: a mixed methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct 21;35(10):2955–2962. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05834-x. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32440998 10.1007/s11606-020-05834-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources