Latarjet procedure without capsular repair produces favorable clinical results and avoids limitation in external rotation
- PMID: 36951982
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07393-0
Latarjet procedure without capsular repair produces favorable clinical results and avoids limitation in external rotation
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed at analyzing the range of motion (ROM) and other clinical outcomes in patients with > 20% glenoid bone loss who underwent the Latarjet procedure with or without anterior capsule repair.
Methods: This retrospective study included 47 patients with > 20% glenoid bone loss who underwent the classic Latarjet procedure from 2016 to 2021. Of these, 25 did not undergo capsular repair (no-capsular-repair group; group I) whereas 22 patients did (capsular-repair group; group II). The Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Visual Analogue Scale, ROM, recurrence, and complications were evaluated before and 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. A goniometer was used to measure the forward flexion and external rotation (arm adducted, 90° abducted) of both shoulders. The ROM deficit was measured as the difference from the contralateral healthy shoulder.
Results: The external rotation in arm adduction at 3 and 6 months after surgery showed significantly better results in group I than group II(p = 0.002 at 3 months; p = 0.005 at 6 months). The deficit in external rotation with arm adduction was also significantly lower in group I at 3 months (p = 0.001) and 6 months (p = 0.001) after surgery. However, external rotation with arm adduction at 12 months after surgery did not significantly differ between the groups. Moreover, the ROM in external rotation with 90° arm abduction was significantly better in group I than that in group II at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p = 0.005, respectively). The deficit in external rotation with 90° arm abduction gradually decreased with time after surgery and differed significantly between the groups. However, the difference in deficit between the two groups at 12 months after surgery did not exceed the measurement error. All clinical scores significantly improved after surgery compared to before surgery; however, the improvement did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure without capsular repair showed good laxity restoration and clinical results with less early postoperative external rotation limitation than that achieved by the same procedure with capsular repair. However, external rotation deficit at 1 year after surgery did not show a clinically relevant difference difference between the two groups.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: Capsular repair; Glenoid bone loss; Instability; Latarjet; Range of motion.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Similar articles
-
Capsular repair is not an important part of the Latarjet-Walch procedure.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):948-956. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.030. Epub 2021 Nov 19. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022. PMID: 34808352
-
Borderline Glenoid Bone Defect in Anterior Shoulder Instability: Latarjet Procedure Versus Bankart Repair.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2170-2176. doi: 10.1177/0363546518776978. Epub 2018 Jun 7. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29879363
-
A comparative study of the effect of capsular repair in the Latarjet procedure.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 25;26(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08278-8. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 39856648 Free PMC article.
-
Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage versus Latarjet procedure for management of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions with subcritical glenoid bone loss in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Oct;29(10):2163-2174. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.032. Epub 2020 Jun 9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020. PMID: 32807370
-
Similar outcomes between arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation under anesthesia for frozen shoulder: A meta-analysis.Asian J Surg. 2024 Oct;47(10):4287-4294. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.03.055. Epub 2024 Mar 25. Asian J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38531739 Review.
Cited by
-
Recurrent posterior shoulder instability-Long-term results after arthroscopic posterior bone block with capsular reconstruction.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Feb 12;12(1):e70166. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70166. eCollection 2025 Jan. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 39944724 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arner JW, Tanghe K, Shields T, Abdelaziz A, Lee S, Peebles L et al (2021) Shoulder Latarjet surgery shows wide variation in reported indications, techniques, perioperative treatment, and definition of outcomes, complications, and failure: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 38(2):522–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.020 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Belangero PS, Schmidt Lara PH, Figueiredo EA, Andreoli CV, de Castro PA, Ejnisman B et al (2021) Bristow versus Latarjet in athletes: a prospective randomized comparison. JSES Int 5(2):165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.004 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Blonna D, Bellato E, Caranzano F, Assom M, Rossi R, Castoldi F (2016) Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Bristow-Latarjet for shoulder instability: a matched-pair multicenter study focused on return to sport. Am J Sports Med 44(12):3198–3205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516658037 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bodine M, Bishai SK, Ball GR, King CN, Wait L, Brannan GD (2022) Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure does not lead to loss of clinically significant external rotation at 0° and 90° of shoulder abduction. JSES Int 6(6):1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.07.013 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Boileau P, Gendre P, Saliken DJ, Thélu CÉ, Trojani C (2022) Tensioning device increases coracoid bone block healing rates in arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with suture-button fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31(7):1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.126 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials