Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;97(5):1267-1283.
doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03485-5. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

Modernizing persistence-bioaccumulation-toxicity (PBT) assessment with high throughput animal-free methods

Affiliations

Modernizing persistence-bioaccumulation-toxicity (PBT) assessment with high throughput animal-free methods

Beate I Escher et al. Arch Toxicol. 2023 May.

Abstract

The assessment of persistence (P), bioaccumulation (B), and toxicity (T) of a chemical is a crucial first step at ensuring chemical safety and is a cornerstone of the European Union's chemicals regulation REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals). Existing methods for PBT assessment are overly complex and cumbersome, have produced incorrect conclusions, and rely heavily on animal-intensive testing. We explore how new-approach methodologies (NAMs) can overcome the limitations of current PBT assessment. We propose two innovative hazard indicators, termed cumulative toxicity equivalents (CTE) and persistent toxicity equivalents (PTE). Together they are intended to replace existing PBT indicators and can also accommodate the emerging concept of PMT (where M stands for mobility). The proposed "toxicity equivalents" can be measured with high throughput in vitro bioassays. CTE refers to the toxic effects measured directly in any given sample, including single chemicals, substitution products, or mixtures. PTE is the equivalent measure of cumulative toxicity equivalents measured after simulated environmental degradation of the sample. With an appropriate panel of animal-free or alternative in vitro bioassays, CTE and PTE comprise key environmental and human health hazard indicators. CTE and PTE do not require analytical identification of transformation products and mixture components but instead prompt two key questions: is the chemical or mixture toxic, and is this toxicity persistent or can it be attenuated by environmental degradation? Taken together, the proposed hazard indicators CTE and PTE have the potential to integrate P, B/M and T assessment into one high-throughput experimental workflow that sidesteps the need for analytical measurements and will support the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability of the European Union.

Keywords: Biodegradation; Hazard assessment; In vitro bioassay; Mobility; New approach methodologies (NAMs); Persistence; Toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors' affiliations are as shown on the cover page. The authors had sole responsibility for the writing and content of the paper. The views and opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the authors' current or former employers.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proposed shift from the traditional PBT indicators implemented in REACH today to our vision of modern high throughput screening indicators that integrate B and M in T and have a joint measure of P and T: cumulative toxicity equivalents (CTE) and persistent toxicity equivalents (PTE). HT  high throughput, CMR carcinogenic, mutagenic, reproduction toxic, EDC endocrine disrupting compounds
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Theoretical application of CTE/PTE hazard indicators for comparative assessment of a chemical and its substitution products

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdelaziz A, Spahn-Langguth H, Schramm KW, Tetko IV. Consensus modeling for HTS assays using in silico descriptors calculates the best balanced accuracy in Tox21 challenge. Front Environm Sci. 2016 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00002. - DOI
    1. Arp HPH, Hale SE. Assessing the persistence and mobility of organic substances to protect freshwater resources. ACS Environm Au. 2022 doi: 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auerbach S, Filer D, Reif D, Walker V, Holloway Alison C, Schlezinger J, Srinivasan S, Svoboda D, Judson R, Bucher John R, Thayer Kristina A. Prioritizing environmental chemicals for obesity and diabetes outcomes research: a screening approach using ToxCast™ High-throughput data. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(8):1141–1154. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1510456. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aven T. On Some recent definitions and analysis frameworks for risk, vulnerability, and resilience. Risk Anal. 2011;31(4):515–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01528.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ball N, Bars R, Botham PA, Cuciureanu A, Cronin MTD, Doe JE, Dudzina T, Gant TW, Leist M, van Ravenzwaay B. A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH. Arch Toxicol. 2022;96(3):743–766. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03215-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources