Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283221.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283221. eCollection 2023.

Sleeping with time in mind? A literature review and a proposal for a screening questionnaire on self-awakening

Affiliations
Review

Sleeping with time in mind? A literature review and a proposal for a screening questionnaire on self-awakening

Laura Verga et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Some people report being able to spontaneously "time" the end of their sleep. This ability to self-awaken challenges the idea of sleep as a passive cognitive state. Yet, current evidence on this phenomenon is limited, partly because of the varied definitions of self-awakening and experimental approaches used to study it. Here, we provide a review of the literature on self-awakening. Our aim is to i) contextualise the phenomenon, ii) propose an operating definition, and iii) summarise the scientific approaches used so far. The literature review identified 17 studies on self-awakening. Most of them adopted an objective sleep evaluation (76%), targeted nocturnal sleep (76%), and used a single criterion to define the success of awakening (82%); for most studies, this corresponded to awakening occurring in a time window of 30 minutes around the expected awakening time. Out of 715 total participants, 125 (17%) reported to be self-awakeners, with an average age of 23.24 years and a slight predominance of males compared to females. These results reveal self-awakening as a relatively rare phenomenon. To facilitate the study of self-awakening, and based on the results of the literature review, we propose a quick paper-and-pencil screening questionnaire for self-awakeners and provide an initial validation for it. Taken together, the combined results of the literature review and the proposed questionnaire help in characterising a theoretical framework for self-awakenings, while providing a useful tool and empirical suggestions for future experimental studies, which should ideally employ objective measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic representation of a taxonomy for awakenings.
Fig 2
Fig 2. PRISMA flow diagram summarizing the selection procedure.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Differences between Self-Awakeners (n = 9) and non-Self-Awakeners (n = 144) by test scores.
The difference between groups was non-significant for all measures. For all boxplots, each box contains the interquartile range (i.e., the range containing 50% of all observations) and the median value (middle line), while the whiskers represent values extending outside 50% of the observations. Abbreviations: ISI = Insomnia Severity Index; MEQ = Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PSWQ = Penn State Worry Questionnaire STAI = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory RRS = Ruminative Response Scale; PSAS = Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale; CES = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (see S1 File for details).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Distribution of the SAQ scores depending on the respondent’s circadian preference group.
Each boxplot contains the interquartile range (i.e., the range containing 50% of all observations) and the median value (middle line), while the whiskers represent values extending outside 50% of the observations.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Proposed schematic model of the cognitive operations potentially involved in self-awakening.

Similar articles

References

    1. Stickgold R, Walker M. The neuroscience of sleep. San Diego: Academic Press; 2010.
    1. Tempesta D, Socci V, De Gennaro L, Ferrara M. Sleep and emotional processing. Sleep Med Rev. 2018;40: 183–195. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klinzing JG, Niethard N, Born J. Mechanisms of systems memory consolidation during sleep. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22: 1598–1610. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0467-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walker MP. The Role of Sleep in Cognition and Emotion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1156: 168–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04416.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baird B, Mota-Rolim SA, Dresler M. The cognitive neuroscience of lucid dreaming. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;100: 305–323. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed