Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283132.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283132. eCollection 2023.

Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: A pilot study

Maskit Bar-Meir  1   2 , Shoshana Bendelac  3 , Irina Shchors  3
Affiliations

Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: A pilot study

Maskit Bar-Meir et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Concerns regarding potential risk of dermal irritation have led to the exclusion of NICU patients from the recommendation regarding the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) wash for daily skin cleansing to reduce bloodstream infections. Our aim was to assess the safety of 2% CHG bathing in NICU patients.

Methods: The regulator required a stepwise study enrollment to three successive groups: term infants, followed by near-term and pre-term infants. For comparison, we used a cohort of matched controls. A propensity score-adjusted regression model was used to compare the groups.

Intervention: Infants were bathed thrice-weekly with 2% CHG-impregnated washcloths. Participant's skin was examined daily.

Results: Over a total of 661 days of treatment: 384,129, and 148 days for the term, near-term and pre-term groups, respectively, no skin reactions were observed. The intervention group was generally sicker, however, bloodstream infections were similar between the groups.

Conclusion: For infants >30 weeks and >3 days old, 2% CHG bathing was safe. Large multicenter studies are urgently needed to establish the effectiveness of this practice in the NICU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Participant flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al.. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):285–91. Epub 2002/08/08. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.2.285 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR, Vohr B, et al.. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA. 2004;292(19):2357–65. Epub 2004/11/18. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.19.2357 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quach C, Milstone AM, Perpete C, Bonenfant M, Moore DL, Perreault T. Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: impact on central line-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(2):158–63. Epub 2014/01/21. doi: 10.1086/674862 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elward AM, Hollenbeak CS, Warren DK, Fraser VJ. Attributable cost of nosocomial primary bloodstream infection in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):868–72. Epub 2005/04/05. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0256 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patrick SW, Kawai AT, Kleinman K, Jin R, Vaz L, Gay C, et al.. Health care-associated infections among critically ill children in the US, 2007–2012. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):705–12. Epub 2014/09/10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0613 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types