Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0280638.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280638. eCollection 2023.

Recruitment strategies and HPV self-collection return rates for under-screened women for cervical cancer prevention

Affiliations

Recruitment strategies and HPV self-collection return rates for under-screened women for cervical cancer prevention

Jennifer S Smith et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In the United States, medically underserved women carry a heavier burden of cancer incidence and mortality, yet are largely underrepresented in cancer prevention studies. My Body, My Test is a n observational cohort, multi-phase cervical cancer prevention study in North Carolina that recruited low-income women, aged 30-65 years and who had not undergone Pap testing in ≥ 4 years. Participants were offered home-based self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples for primary HPV testing. Here, we aimed to describe the recruitment strategies utilized by study staff, and the resulting recruitment and self-collection kit return rates for each specific recruitment strategy. Participants were recruited through different approaches: either direct (active, staff-effort intensive) or indirect (passive on the part of study staff). Of a total of 1,475 individuals screened for eligibility, 695 were eligible (47.1%) and 487 (70% of eligible) participants returned their self-collection kit. Small media recruitment resulted in the highest number of individuals found to be study eligible, with a relatively high self-collection kit return of 70%. In-clinic in-reach resulted in a lower number of study-eligible women, yet had the highest kit return rate (90%) among those sent kits. In contrast, 211 recruitment which resulted in the lowest kit return of 54%. Small media, word of mouth, and face-to-face outreach resulted in self-collection kit return rates ranging from 72 to 79%. The recruitment strategies undertaken by study staff support the continued study of reaching under-screened populations into cervical cancer prevention studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ACD had some conference travel expenses covered by Hologic in the past 5 years. JSS has received research grants and consultancies from Hologic, Becton Dickenson, and Trovagene in the past 5 years. No other authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Overall progression of individuals through study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howlander N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al.. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. National Cancer Institute. 2016;1–7.
    1. Watson M, Saraiya M, Benard V, Coughlin SS, Flowers L, Cokkinides V, et al.. Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998–2003. Cancer. 2008;113(S10):2855–64. - PubMed
    1. Weitz TA, Freund KM, Wright L. Identifying and caring for underserved populations: Experience of the National Centers of Excellence in Women’s Health. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 2001;10(10):937–52. doi: 10.1089/152460901317193521 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Behbakht K, Lynch A, Teal S, Degeest K, Massad S. Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;104(6):1355–61. - PubMed
    1. Freeman H, Wingrove B. Excess Cervical Cancer Mortality: A Marker for Low Access to Health Care in Poor Communities [Internet]. Rockville, MD; 2005. May [cited 2021 Jul 25]. Available from: http://crchd.nci.nih.gov.

Publication types

MeSH terms