Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0281193.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281193. eCollection 2023.

Temperature and feeding frequency impact the survival, growth, and metamorphosis success of Solea solea larvae

Affiliations

Temperature and feeding frequency impact the survival, growth, and metamorphosis success of Solea solea larvae

Adriana E Sardi et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Human-induced climate change impacts the oceans, increasing their temperature, changing their circulation and chemical properties, and affecting marine ecosystems. Like most marine species, sole has a biphasic life cycle, where one planktonic larval stage and juvenile/adult stages occur in a different ecological niche. The year-class strength, usually quantified by the end of the larvae stage, is crucial for explaining the species' recruitment. We implemented an experimental system for rearing larvae under laboratory conditions and experimentally investigated the effects of temperature and feeding frequencies on survival, development (growth), and metamorphosis success of S. solea larvae. Specific questions addressed in this work include: what are the effects of feeding regimes on larvae development? How does temperature impact larvae development? Our results highlight that survival depends on the first feeding, that the onset of metamorphosis varies according to rearing temperature and that poorly fed larvae take significantly longer to start (if they do) metamorphosing. Moreover, larvae reared at the higher temperature (a +4°C scenario) showed a higher incidence in metamorphosis defects. We discuss the implications of our results in an ecological context, notably in terms of recruitment and settlement. Understanding the processes that regulate the abundance of wild populations is of primary importance, especially if these populations are living resources exploited by humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Fully metamorphosed Solea solea larva.
A fully metamorphosed larva showing full asymmetrical body, rounded head and complete left eye migration.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Experimental design.
Number of plates used per treatment at both experiment 1 and 2 (a) and timeline protocol followed during experiment 2, for larvae reared at 16°C (control temperature treatment) and at 20°C (RCP 8.5 temperature treatment), that included a temperature acclimation for larvae.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Larvae survival during the experiment.
Percentage of survival with fitted four parameter logistic regressions in S. solea according to the feeding frequency at two different temperatures. a: whole experiment duration (33 days larvae aged 35 dph). b: Solid lines represent linear models fitted to the to the second’s week percentage of survival with 95% confidence level intervals (shadow area).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Length of sole (mm) larvae reared at different temperatures and different feeding frequencies in experiment 2.
Left panels: larvae reared at 16°C. Right panels: larvae reared at 20°C at high (blue), medium (yellow) and low (grey) feeding frequencies.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Dry weight of sole (mm) larvae reared at different temperatures and different feeding frequencies in experiment 2.
Left panels: larvae reared at 16°C. Right panels: larvae reared at 20°C at high (blue), medium (yellow) and low (grey) feeding frequencies.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Metamorphic index in Solea solea larvae.
Differences in the metamorphosis onset and development of larvae reared at two temperatures and 3 different feeding frequencies (high, medium and low food).

References

    1. IPCC. Climate change 2021 The physical Science Basis. IPCC. 2021.
    1. Lotze HK, Tittensor DP, Bryndum-Buchholz A, Eddy TD, Cheung WWL, Galbraith ED, et al.. Global ensemble projections reveal trophic amplification of ocean biomass declines with climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(26):12907–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900194116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lefort S, Aumont O, Bopp L, Arsouze T, Gehlen M, Maury O. Spatial and body-size dependent response of marine pelagic communities to projected global climate change. Glob Chang Biol. 2015;21(1):154–64. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12679 - DOI - PubMed
    1. IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5 C Summary for Policymakers. In 2018.
    1. Ghiglione JF, Laudet V. Marine Life Cycle: A Polluted Terra Incognita Is Unveiled. Curr Biol [Internet]. 2020;30(3):R130–3. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.083 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types