Where Are We in 2022? A Summary of 11,000 Open Tibia Fractures Over 4 Decades
- PMID: 36952593
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002602
Where Are We in 2022? A Summary of 11,000 Open Tibia Fractures Over 4 Decades
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the infection and nonunion rates for open tibia fracture treatment over the past 4 decades since the introduction of the Gustilo-Anderson (GA) open fracture classification.
Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were reviewed using the PRISMA checklist for articles between 1977 and September 2018.
Study selection: One hundred sixty-one articles meeting the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between 1977 and 2018, reported infection rates, reported nonunion rates, and fractures classified by the GA open fracture criteria were selected.
Data extraction: All articles were thoroughly evaluated to extract infection and nonunion data for open tibia fractures.
Data synthesis: Due to variability in the data reviewed, statistical evaluation could not be reliably done.
Results: 11,326 open tibia fractures were reported with 17% type I, 25.2% type II, 25.3% type IIIA, and 32.5% type IIIB/C. The average infection rate over 4 decades was 18.3%, with 24.3% superficial, 11.2% deep, and 14.7% pin tract. The infection rate by decade was 14% for 1977-1986, 16.2% for 1987-1996, 20.5% for 1997%-2006%, and 18.1% from 2007 to 2017. The overall nonunion rate was 14.1%. The nonunion rate was 13% for 1977-1986, 17% for 1987-1996, 12.8% for 1997%-2006%, and 12.3% for 2007-2017.
Conclusions: This in-depth summary has demonstrated that the percentage rate for infections and nonunion has remained similar over the past 40 years.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Plate-Assisted Intramedullary Nailing of Gustilo Type IIIB Open Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures: Does Adjunctive Plate Retention Affect Complication Rate?J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;34(7):363-369. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001738. J Orthop Trauma. 2020. PMID: 31972709
-
No Incidence of Postoperative Knee Sepsis With Suprapatellar Nailing of Open Tibia Fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Feb;31(2):85-89. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000725. J Orthop Trauma. 2017. PMID: 27763961
-
A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study Comparing Temporary Internal Fixation to External Fixation at the First Stage Debridement in the Treatment of Type IIIB Open Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar;33(3):125-130. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001362. J Orthop Trauma. 2019. PMID: 30779724
-
The use of gentamicin-coated nails in complex open tibia fracture and revision cases: A retrospective analysis of a single centre case series and review of the literature.Injury. 2015 Dec;46(12):2433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.028. Epub 2015 Oct 8. Injury. 2015. PMID: 26477343 Review.
-
Systematic review of patient reported outcomes from open tibia fractures in low and middle income countries.Injury. 2020 Feb;51(2):142-146. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 11. Injury. 2020. PMID: 31767370
Cited by
-
Prevention and treatment of osteomyelitis after open tibia fractures.OTA Int. 2024 Jun 5;7(4 Suppl):e309. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000309. eCollection 2024 Jun. OTA Int. 2024. PMID: 38840709 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Strategies in the Prevention and Management of Infection in Open Fractures.J Orthop Sports Med. 2025;7(2):218-229. doi: 10.26502/josm.511500198. Epub 2025 May 5. J Orthop Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40519719 Free PMC article.
-
Classification of open tibia fractures: the rationale for a new classification system.OTA Int. 2024 Jun 5;7(4 Suppl):e318. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000318. eCollection 2024 Jun. OTA Int. 2024. PMID: 38840710 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Delayed Union and Nonunion: Current Concepts, Prevention, and Correction: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 22;11(6):525. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060525. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38927761 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lack WD, Karunakar MA, Angerame MR, et al. Type III open tibia fractures: immediate antibiotic prophylaxis minimizes. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:1–6.
-
- Wordsworth M, Lawton G, Nathwani D, et al. Improving the care of patients with severe open fractures of the tibia. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B()420–424.
-
- Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:453–458.
-
- D'Alleyrand JC, Manson TT, Dancy L, et al. Is time to flap coverage of open tibial fractures an independent predictor of flap-related complications?. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:288.
-
- Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M, Guyatt G, et al. Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT) investigators. Prognostic factors for predicting outcomes after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1786–1793.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous