Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 14:20:25.
doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369627. eCollection 2023.

Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods

Affiliations
Review

Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods

Saba Safarzadeh et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). .

Abstract

Background: During the orthodontic bonding process, the need for repositioning or rebonding of orthodontic brackets on the enamel surface occurs frequently. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) in rebonding orthodontic stainless steel brackets with three different methods of enamel surface conditioning methods.

Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, 80 human premolars that were extracted for orthodontic purposes were randomly divided into four groups and underwent orthodontic bonding procedure (N = 20). Except for the control group, three other groups underwent debonding and rebonding process in which after removing the remaining adhesive with tungsten-carbide bur, enamel surface conditioned by three different methods including re-etching with phosphoric acid, sandblasting + acid etching, and Erbium-doped Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser. Then, the SBS of the bracket to the enamel surface was compared between different groups. Scanning Electron microscopy images were also obtained from a number of samples. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.

Results: The highest SBS was observed in the primary bond (control group) with an average of 29,440 MPa. There was a significant difference between the studied groups (P < 0.001) and only the group that was re-etched with phosphoric acid had no significant difference with the control group (P = 0.708) ∝ =0.05.

Conclusion: Rebonding of brackets using phosphoric acid for reconditioning of the enamel surface creates bond strength comparable to the primary bond. Other groups had significantly lower SBS than the control group.

Keywords: Dental air abrasion; dental bonding; dental debonding; orthodontic bracket; shear strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or non-financial in this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SEM images: (a) Primary etching with phosphoric. (b) Re-etching with phosphoric acid. (c) Re-etching with sandblasting + phosphoric acid. (d) Re-etching with Er:YAG laser. SEM: Scanning electron microscope; Er:YAG: Erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet.

Similar articles

References

    1. Khanal PP, Shrestha BK, Yadav R, Prasad Gupta S. A comparative study on the effect of different methods of recycling orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength. Int J Dent 2021. 2021:8844085. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohammed RE, Abass S, Abubakr NH, Mohammed ZM. Comparing orthodontic bond failures of light-cured composite resin with chemical-cured composite resin: A 12-month clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150:290–4. - PubMed
    1. Sallam RA, Arnout EA. Effect of Er: YAG laser etching on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket. Saudi Med J. 2018;39:922–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akhoundi MS, Etemadi A, Nasiri M, Borujeni ES. Comparison of enamel morphologic characteristics after conditioning with various combinations of acid etchant and Er: YAG laser in bonding and rebonding procedures: A SEM analysis. J Dent (Tehran) 2017;14:144–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171–8.