Perceived responsibility for mechanical ventilation and weaning decisions in intensive care units in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- PMID: 36960097
- PMCID: PMC10029168
- DOI: 10.29390/cjrt-2022-053
Perceived responsibility for mechanical ventilation and weaning decisions in intensive care units in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Background: Optimizing patient outcomes and reducing complications require constant monitoring and effective collaboration among critical care professionals. The aim of the present study was to describe the perceptions of physician directors, respiratory therapist managers and nurse managers regarding the key roles, responsibilities and clinical decision-making related to mechanical ventilation and weaning in adult Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).
Methods: A multi-centre, cross-sectional self-administered survey was sent to physician directors, respiratory therapist managers and nurse managers of 39 adult ICUs at governmental tertiary referral hospitals in 13 administrative regions of the KSA. The participants were advised to discuss the survey with the frontline bedside staff to gather feedback from the physicians, respiratory therapists and nurses themselves on key mechanical ventilation and weaning decisions in their units. We performed T-test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests to test the physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses' autonomy and influence scores, collaborative or single decisions among the professionals. Moreover, logistic regressions were performed to examine organizational variables associated with collaborative decision-making.
Results: The response rate was 67% (14/21) from physician directors, 84% (22/26) from respiratory therapist managers and 37% (11/30) from nurse managers. Physician directors and respiratory therapist managers agreed to collaborate significantly in most of the key decisions with limited nurses' involvement (P<0.01). We also found that physician directors were perceived to have greater autonomy and influence in ventilation and waning decision-making with a mean of 8.29 (SD±1.49), and 8.50 (SD±1.40), respectively.
Conclusion: The key decision-making was implemented mainly by physicians and respiratory therapists in collaboration. Nurses had limited involvement. Physician directors perceived higher autonomy and influence in ventilatory and weaning decision-making than respiratory therapist managers and nurse managers. A critical care unit's capacity to deliver effective and safe patient care may be improved by increasing nurses' participation and acknowledging the role of respiratory therapists in clinical decision-making regarding mechanical ventilation and weaning.
Keywords: clinical decision-making; critical care; decision-making; intensive care unit; mechanical ventilation; role and responsibility.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Hughes MR, Smith CD, Tecklenburg FW, Habib DM, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M. Effects of a weaning protocol on ventilated pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. Top Health Inf Manage 2001;22(2):35–43. - PubMed
-
- MacIntyre NR. Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: A collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 2001;120(6):375S–95S. 10.1378/chest.120.6_suppl.375S - DOI - PubMed
-
- Djunaedi H, Cardinal P, Greffe-Laliberte G, Jones G, Pham B. Does a ventilatory management protocol improve the care of ventilated patients? Respir Care 1997;42(6):604–10.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources