Differences in Implicit Attitudes in West and East Germans as Measured by the Go/NoGo Association Task and Event-related EEG Potentials
- PMID: 36961321
- DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000338
Differences in Implicit Attitudes in West and East Germans as Measured by the Go/NoGo Association Task and Event-related EEG Potentials
Abstract
Background and objective: Implicit social cognition refers to attitudes and stereotypes that may reside outside conscious awareness and control but that still affect human behavior. In particular, the implicit favoritism of an ingroup, to which an individual belongs, as opposed to an outgroup, to which the individual does not belong, characterized as ingroup bias, is of interest and is investigated here.
Method: We used a Go/NoGo association task (GNAT) and behavioral and electroencephalographic (event-related EEG potential [ERP] analysis) measures to investigate the implicit bias toward cities in East Germany, West Germany, and Europe, in 16 individuals each from West and East Germany (mixed gender, M age = 24). The GNAT assesses an individual's Go and NoGo responses for a given association between a target category and either pole (positive or negative) of an evaluative dimension.
Results: Behavioral measures revealed slightly faster reaction times to the combination of European city names and negative, as compared with positive, evaluative words in both groups. ERP analysis showed an increased negativity at 400-800 ms poststimulus in the incongruent conditions of East German city/positive word pairings (in West Germans) and West German city/positive word pairings (in East Germans).
Conclusion: An implicitly moderately negative evaluation of Europe by both groups was exhibited based on the behavioral data, and an increased level of conflict arising from the "incongruent" pairings (ie, as manifestation of an implicitly negative attitude toward East Germany in West Germans, and toward West Germany in East Germans) was exhibited based on the electrophysiological data.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Aberson CL, Shoemaker C, Tomolillo C. 2004. Implicit bias and contact: the role of interethnic friendships. J Soc Psychol. 144:335–347. doi:10.3200/SOCP.144.3.335-347 - DOI
-
- Amodio DM. 2019. Social Cognition 2.0: an interactive memory systems account. Trends Cogn Sci. 23:21–33. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.002 - DOI
-
- Amodio DM, Devine PG. 2006. Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 91:652–661. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.652 - DOI
-
- Amodio DM, Ratner KG. 2011. A memory systems model of implicit social cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 20:143–148. doi:10.1177/0963721411408562 - DOI
-
- Amodio DM, Harmon-Jones E, Devine PG, et al. 2004. Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychol Sci. 15:88–93. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502003.x - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources