Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;136(5-6):177-184.
doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02164-w. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

Homeopathy-A lively relic of the prescientific era

Affiliations

Homeopathy-A lively relic of the prescientific era

Yannick Borkens et al. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Homeopathy was first postulated by the German physician Samuel Hahnemann in 1796 and 220 years later homeopathy is the most popular and widespread alternative medicine. Partly, it is also part of the national healthcare and insurance systems but homeopathy is not without controversy within the medical and healthcare community. Its implausible basic assumptions, some of which contradict natural laws, do not lead us to expect that its remedies have any specific effect. In fact, there is no study or systematic review to date that reliably certifies homeopathy to have an effect beyond the placebo effect and other context effects. In this respect it must be disconcerting how widely homeopathy is applied and represented in therapeutic practice. It indeed claims a role within scientific (evidence-based) medicine but cannot substantiate this claim. It displays clear characteristics of pseudoscience [1]. This implies a lot of problems, such as misleading people and tackling medical ethics up to scientific publication practices. Furthermore, it turns out that quite a few people do not know exactly what homeopathy is, which may lead them to make wrong decisions for their personal health. This article summarizes the information about homeopathy and its problematic implications and serves as a general introduction to this topic and its unacceptable role in today's medicine.The medical irrelevance of the sham method of homeopathy has been proven with more than sufficient probability [2]. As a major testimonial, the statement "Homeopathic products and practices" of the European (EASAC 2017) can be regarded. The primary aim of this brief report is therefore not to take another look at homeopathy from a medical scientific perspective, but rather focus attention on the implications of the still continuous and largely uncritically accepted existence of this method in medical practice, in the medical scientific sphere and in the judgement of the general public.

Keywords: Alternative medicine; Brief Report; Evidence-based medicine; Homeopathy; Scientific integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Y. Borkens is a member of the German health think tank Informationsnetzwerk Homöopathie. U. Endruscheit is a member, author and spokesman of the German health think tank Informationsnetzwerk Homöopathie. C.W. Lübbers is a member, author and spokesman of the German health think tank Informationsnetzwerk Homöopathie. There are no fees or benefits for this activity. The INH is a non-profit organization in the field of consumer and patient protection. There is no conflict of interest beyond that.

References

    1. Mukerji N, Ernst E. Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience. Synthèse. 2022;200:394. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03882-w. - DOI
    1. Cukaci C, Freissmuth M, Mann C, et al. Against all odds—the persistent popularity of homeopathy. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020;132(9–10):232–242. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01624-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinet P. Hufeland (1762–1836) et I’homéopathie. Rev Hist Pharm (paris) 2022;50(335):481–494. - PubMed
    1. Schmacke N. Homöopathie: Heilslehre „ohne Substanz“. Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 2020;63(5):541–547. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03125-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zauner B. Erwiderung: Homöopathie als sinnvolle Ergänzung der konventionellen Medizin. Klinikarzt. 2019;48(8–9):317–318.