Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;309(4):1333-1340.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07011-x. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

Sonographic examination at the beginning of the second stage of labor predicts birth outcome in vaginally intended breech deliveries: a blinded prospective study

Affiliations

Sonographic examination at the beginning of the second stage of labor predicts birth outcome in vaginally intended breech deliveries: a blinded prospective study

Lukas Jennewein et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: In order to spread competence in vaginal breech deliveries, it is necessary to develop new and easily applicable tools for birth progression and safety evaluation. Ultrasound is a useful and ubiquitously available tool with already documented value for birth progression observation. In deliveries out of breech presentation, an established ultrasound examination is missing. We determined the descent of the fetal buttocks in relation to the maternal pelvic inlet using intrapartum ultrasound. We evaluated these results in comparison to the clinical vaginal examination with the aim to establish an easily applicable method for birth outcome prediction. Therefore, we analyzed the predictive value of our examinations on birth outcome parameters, such as cesarean section rate, as well as fetal and maternal outcome parameters.

Methods: We performed a prospective blinded study on 106 mothers with vaginally intended breech delivery. At beginning of stage two in labor, the descent of the fetal buttocks into the mother's pelvic inlet was detected with transabdominal ultrasound and vaginal examination by different observers.

Primary outcome variable: Cesarean section rate. Secondary outcome variables: rate of manual assistance in vaginal deliveries, birth duration, 5' APGAR score, umbilical arterial pH, maternal blood loss, and perineal injury. For non-parametric values, Wilcoxon's χ2 test was performed. In order to analyze the predictive value of our examination, lack-of-fit analysis was conducted. Reliability evaluation of the sonographic examination was done with a matched-pair analysis.

Results: Women with positive intrapartum ultrasound breech engagement sign (+ IPUBES) had a significantly lower rate of cesarean section in comparison with those with negative IPUBES (5/67; 7.5% vs. 18/39; 46.2%; p < 0.0001). The area under the ROC curve for the prediction of CS for negative IPUBES was 0.765 with a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 74.7%. Sonographic examination showed an excellent reliability in a matched-pair analysis comparing vaginal and sonographic examinations with a mean difference of 0.012 (SD ± 0.027, 95% CI - 0.014 to 0.065). Mean birth duration was significantly longer in deliveries with negative IPUBES (533 min vs. 440 min; p = 0.0011). Fetal and maternal outcome parameters were not significantly different between deliveries with positive and negative IPUBES.

Conclusions: Sonographic evaluation of the fetal descent in relation to the mother's pelvic inlet screens reliably for emergency cesarean section. This newly presented method for birth progression observation might be a powerful tool for distribution of expertise in vaginal breech delivery and is able to give reference for clinical vaginal examination by obstetricians in training.

Trail registry: Clinical trial. Date of registration: 13.03.2019; Date of initial participant enrollment: 20.03.2019; DRKS00016885; https://www.drks.de ; German clinical trials register.

Keywords: Birth observation; Delivery outcome; Ultrasound examination; Vaginal breech delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support was received during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sonographic examination results, A schematic and B sonographic example showing a negative intrapartum ultrasound breech engagement sign. The fetal pelvis is above the pelvic inlet of the mother. C Schematic and D sonographic example showing a positive intrapartum ultrasound breech engagement sign. The fetal pelvis has entered the maternal pelvic inlet. 1: Maternal symphysis or pubic crest, 2: fetal pelvic bone/hip

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Uotila J, Tuimala R, Kirkinen P. Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:578–583. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00248.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart J-M, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1002–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casteels M, Podevyn K, Vanoverschelde H, Louwen F. Implementation of a breech program in a Belgian obstetric team. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 doi: 10.1002/IJGO.14003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Neill S, Khashan A, Kenny L, Greene R, Henriksen T, Lutomski J, et al. Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120:671–680. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12165. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Neill SM, Kearney PM, Kenny LC, Khashan AS, Henriksen TB, Lutomski JE, et al. Caesarean delivery and subsequent stillbirth or miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Middleton P, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054588. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types