Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;20(3):409-419.
doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10241-y. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

Patients' Values and Desire for Autonomy: An Empirical Study from Poland

Affiliations

Patients' Values and Desire for Autonomy: An Empirical Study from Poland

Agnieszka Olchowska-Kotala et al. J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

There is a growing body of literature concerning factors that can influence patients' perception, preferences, or expectations with regard to autonomy in making healthcare decisions. Although many factors responsible for the desire for autonomy in medical decision-making are already recognized, little is known about how the desire for autonomy is related to values, which refer to important goals of human actions. The present study was designed to determine the relationship between the desire for autonomy and basic personal values drawn on Schwartz's value theory. We conducted survey in two age groups: younger and older adults. In the group of younger adults, the desire for autonomy was associated with the need to be appreciated as a person, motivation to act independently, and the abandonment of traditional order and values, whereas in the group of older adults, with independent thinking and a lack of humility. Our study highlighted that the desire for autonomy may result from slightly different reasons in people of particular age groups. These findings might be helpful for medical professionals in developing accurate communication patterns with different age groups of patients.

Keywords: Desire for Autonomy; Healthcare Decision; Schwartz’s Theory; Value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Circular motivational continuum of 19 values with sources that underlie their order. (adapted from Schwartz et al. 2012).

References

    1. Bardi A, Schwartz SH. Relations among sociopolitical values in Eastern Europe: Effects of the communist experience? Political Psychology. 1996;17(3):525. doi: 10.2307/3791967. - DOI
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.
    1. British Medical Journal Nuremberg Code [1947] British Medical Journal. 1996;313:1448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1448. - DOI
    1. Cataldi JR, Sevick C, Pyrzanowski J, et al. Addressing personal parental values in decisions about childhood vaccination: Measure development. Vaccine. 2019;37(38):5688–5697. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, et al. Patient preferences for shared decisions : A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2012;86(1):9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources