Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 May;40(5):2412-2425.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02480-7. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

Comparative Efficacy of Teclistamab Versus Current Treatments in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Prospective LocoMMotion Study in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparative Efficacy of Teclistamab Versus Current Treatments in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Prospective LocoMMotion Study in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Philippe Moreau et al. Adv Ther. 2023 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE-RRMM) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody, was studied in patients with TCE-RRMM in the single-arm MajesTEC-1 study. To assess the relative effectiveness of teclistamab versus real-world physician's choice of therapy (RWPC), adjusted comparisons were performed using individual patient data from MajesTEC-1 and LocoMMotion, a prospective study of patients with TCE-RRMM.

Methods: An external control arm for MajesTEC-1 was created from patients in LocoMMotion (n = 248; clinical cut-off: November 2, 2021) and compared with treated patients (n = 165) from MajesTEC-1 (teclistamab 1.5 mg/kg weekly; clinical cut-off: March 16, 2022). Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline covariates. For binary endpoints [overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) rate, complete response or better (≥ CR)], relative effect of teclistamab versus RWPC was estimated with an odds ratio and relative response rate and 95% confidence interval (CI), derived from weighted logistic regression. Weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for time-to-event endpoints [duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)].

Results: After weighting, baseline characteristics were balanced across cohorts. In adjusted comparisons, teclistamab-treated patients were 2.3-fold, 5.2-fold and 148.3-fold, more likely to reach ORR [response-rate ratio (RR) = 2.31, 95% CI 1.77-2.85, p < 0.0001], ≥ VGPR (RR = 5.19, 95% CI 3.26-7.12, p < 0.0001) and ≥ CR (RR = 148.25, 95% CI 20.63-1065.40, p < 0.0001), respectively, versus patients receiving RWPC. Following adjustment, DOR (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54, p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.35-0.65, p < 0.0001) were significantly longer with teclistamab versus RWPC. OS was numerically better with teclistamab versus RWPC [HR 0.77 (0.55-1.09), p = 0.1419].

Conclusion: Teclistamab demonstrated improved effectiveness versus RWPC, highlighting its clinical benefit as a novel and effective treatment for patients with TCE-RRMM.

Trial registration: Majest TEC-1, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04557098; LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04035226.

Keywords: LocoMMotion; MajesTEC-1; Teclistamab; Triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Philippe Moreau has held a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi; and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi. Niels W. C. J. van de Donk has received honoraria from Celgene; held a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Servier, and Takeda; and received research funding from Amgen, BMS, Cellectis, and Janssen. Michel Delforge has held a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Celgene, and Janssen; and received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, and Janssen. Hermann Einsele has held a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda; received travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda; and received research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, and Janssen. Valerio De Stefano has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, and Takeda. Aurore Perrot has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Takeda. Britta Besemer has received travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Janssen-Cilag; and received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag. Charlotte Pawlyn has received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. Lionel Karlin reports employment (family member) by Aguettant; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda; has held a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda; and has received travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Amgen, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. Salomon Manier has received research funding from AbbVie, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda. Xavier Leleu has held a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Roche, and Takeda; received travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Takeda; and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. Katja Weisel has held a consulting or advisory role for Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Oncopeptides, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; has received travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, and Takeda; received honoraria from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, and Takeda; and has received research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, and Sanofi. Francesca Ghilotti is employed by Janssen. Joris Diels is employed by and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. Ahmed Elsada was employed by Janssen-Cilag during the conduct of the research and publication development; he is currently an employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Raul Morano is employed by Janssen. Vadim Strulev is employed by and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. Lixia Pei is employed by and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. Rachel Kobos is employed by and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. Jennifer Smit is employed by, has stock/other ownership interests in, and has received travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from Johnson & Johnson/Janssen. Mary Slavcev is employed by and has stock/other ownership interests in Janssen. Maria-Victoria Mateos has held a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda; and received honoraria from AbbVie/Genentech, Amgen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, and Takeda.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Response outcomes. CI confidence interval, ≥ CR complete response or better, OR odds ratio, ORR overall response rate, PR partial response, RR response rate ratio, RWPC real-world physician’s choice of therapy, ≥ VGPR very good partial response or better
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Unadjusted and adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves for a OS, b PFS, and c DOR. CI confidence interval, DOR duration of response, HR hazard ratio, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, RWPC real-world physician’s choice of therapy

References

    1. Orlowski RZ, Nagler A, Sonneveld P, et al. Randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib compared with bortezomib alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: combination therapy improves time to progression. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3892–3901. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5460. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, et al. EHA Guidelines Committee; multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Baldassarre F, Kanjeekal S, Herst J, Hicks L, Cheung M. Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma—a practice guideline. Curr Oncol. 2013;20:e136–e149. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1252. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gay F, Jackson G, Rosiñol L, et al. Maintenance treatment and survival in patients with myeloma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1389–1397. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2961. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird SA, Boyd K. Multiple myeloma: an overview of management. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2019;13:1178224219868235. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data