Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;55(4):626-633.
doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02793-y. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

Effects of uridine and nucleotides on hemostasis parameters

Affiliations

Effects of uridine and nucleotides on hemostasis parameters

Merve Arı et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 May.

Abstract

Several purinergic receptors have been identified on platelets which are involved in hemostatic and thrombotic processes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of uridine and its nucleotides on platelet aggregation and hemostasis in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood. The effects of uridine, UMP, UDP, and UTP at different final concentrations (1 to 1000 µM) on platelet aggregation were studied using an aggregometer. In PRP samples, platelet aggregation was induced by ADP, collagen and epinephrine 3 min after addition of uridine, UMP, UDP, UTP and saline (as a control). All thromboelastogram experiments were performed at 1000 µM final concentrations of uridine and its nucleotides in whole blood. UDP and UTP were also tested in thromboelastogram with PRP. Our results showed that UDP, and especially UTP, inhibited ADP- and collagen-induced aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner. In whole blood thromboelastogram experiments, UDP stimulated clot formation while UTP suppressed clot formation. When thromboelastogram experiments were repeated with PRP, UTP's inhibitory effect on platelets was confirmed, while UDP's stimulated clot forming effect disappeared. Collectively, our data showed that UTP inhibited platelet aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner and suppressed clot formation. On the other hand, UDP exhibited distinct effects on whole blood or PRP in thromboelastogram. These data suggest that the difference on effects of UTP and UDP might have arisen from the different receptors that they stimulate and warrant further investigation with regard to their in vivo actions on platelet aggregation and hemostasis.

Keywords: Aggregometer; Platelets; Thromboelastogram; UDP; UTP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Davi G, Patrono C (2007) Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med 357(24):2482–2494. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra071014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO-Global hearts initiative. [accessed 2020 September 12]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases... )
    1. Burnstock G (2017) Purinergic Signalling: therapeutic developments. Front Pharmacol 8:661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00661 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Cansev M, Orhan F, Yaylagul EO, Isik E, Turkyilmaz M, Aydin S, Gumus A, Sevinc C, Coskun N, Ulus IH, Wurtman RJ (2015) Evidence for the existence of pyrimidinergic transmission in rat brain. Neuropharmacology 91:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kügelgen Iv, Hoffmann K (2016) Pharmacology and structure of P2Y receptors. Neuropharmacology 104:50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.10.030 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources