Identifying effective interventions to promote consumption of protein-rich foods from lower ecological footprint sources: A systematic literature review
- PMID: 36962370
- PMCID: PMC10021177
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000209
Identifying effective interventions to promote consumption of protein-rich foods from lower ecological footprint sources: A systematic literature review
Abstract
Addressing overconsumption of protein-rich foods from high ecological footprint sources can have positive impacts on health such as reduction of non-communicable disease risk and protecting the natural environment. With the increased attention towards development of ecologically sustainable diets, this systematic review aimed to critically review literature on effectiveness of those interventions aiming to promote protein-rich foods from lower ecological footprint sources. Five electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Global Health) were searched for articles published up to January 2021. Quantitative studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported on actual or intended consumption of protein-rich animal-derived and/or plant-based foods; purchase, or selection of meat/plant-based diet in real or virtual environments. We assessed 140 full-text articles for eligibility of which 51 were included in this review. The results were narratively synthesised. Included studies were categorised into individual level behaviour change interventions (n = 33) which included education, counselling and self-monitoring, and micro-environmental/structural behaviour change interventions (n = 18) which included menu manipulation, choice architecture and multicomponent approaches. Half of individual level interventions (52%) aimed to reduce red/processed meat intake among people with current/past chronic conditions which reduced meat intake in the short term. The majority of micro-environmental studies focused on increasing plant-based diet in dining facilities, leading to positive dietary changes. These findings point to a clear gap in the current evidence base for interventions that promote plant-based diet in the general population.
Copyright: © 2022 Ronto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis.Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Sep;2(9):e384-e397. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30188-8. Lancet Planet Health. 2018. PMID: 30177007 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Oct 19;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0729-6. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018. PMID: 30340498 Free PMC article.
-
Meat, fruit, and vegetable consumption in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.Nutr Rev. 2021 May 12;79(6):651-692. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa032. Nutr Rev. 2021. PMID: 32556305
-
The effect of animal versus plant protein on muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance and sarcopenia in adults: protocol for a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 13;11(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01951-2. Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35418173 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Meaningfully reducing consumption of meat and animal products is an unsolved problem: A meta-analysis.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2025 Mar 19:rs.3.rs-5486065. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5486065/v1. Res Sq. 2025. Update in: Appetite. 2025 Aug 5;216:108233. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108233. PMID: 40166031 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
The climate crisis is here: a primer and call to action for public health nutrition researchers and practitioners in high-income countries.Public Health Nutr. 2023 Feb;26(2):496-502. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022002427. Epub 2022 Nov 4. Public Health Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36329644 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tukker A, Jansen B. Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies. J Ind Ecol. 2006;10(3):159–82.
-
- Vermeulen SJ, Campbell BM, Ingram JS. Climate change and food systems. Annu Rev Environ Resourc. 2012;37:195–222.
-
- FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2017. Building resilience for peace and food security. Rome: FAO, 2017. Accessed 30 March 2020. https://apo.org.au/node/249031.
-
- Rosenzweig C, Mbow C, Barioni LG, Benton TG, Herrero M, Krishnapillai M, et al.. Climate change responses benefit from a global food system approach. Nature Food. 2020;1(2):94–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous