Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 3;2(6):e0000583.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000583. eCollection 2022.

Funders: The missing link in equitable global health research?

Affiliations
Review

Funders: The missing link in equitable global health research?

Esmita Charani et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Global health research is mired by inequities, some of which are linked to current approaches to research funding. The role of funders and donors in achieving greater equity in global health research needs to be clearly defined. Imbalances of power and resources between high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is such that many funding approaches do not centre the role of LMIC researchers in shaping global health research priorities and agenda. Relative to need, there is also disparity in financial investment by LMIC governments in health research. These imbalances put at a disadvantage LMIC health professionals and researchers who are at forefront of global health practice. Whilst many LMICs do not have the means (due to geopolitical, historical, and economic reasons) for direct investment, if those with means were to invest more of their own funds in health research, it may help LMICs become more self-sufficient and shift some of the power imbalances. Funders and donors in HICs should address inequities in their approach to research funding and proactively identify mechanisms that assure greater equity-including via direct funding to LMIC researchers and direct funding to build local LMIC-based, led, and run knowledge infrastructures. To collectively shape a new approach to global health research funding, it is essential that funders and donors are part of the conversation. This article provides a way to bring funders and donors into the conversation on equity in global health research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Opportunities for funders to redress the inequities in global health research during the different stages of a grant.

References

    1. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, et al.. Towards a common definition of global health. The Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1993–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhakuni H, Abimbola S. Epistemic injustice in academic global health. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(10):e1465–70. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00301-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rasheed MA. Navigating the violent process of decolonisation in global health research: a guideline. Lancet Glob Health. 2021. Dec;9(12):e1640–1. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00440-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koum Besson ES. How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices: a decolonial guide. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7:e008950. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008950 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abimbola S, Pai M. Will global health survive its decolonisation? The Lancet. 2020;396(10263):1627–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32417-X - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources