Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 11;2(10):e0001134.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001134. eCollection 2022.

A scoping review of the impact of organisational factors on providers and related interventions in LMICs: Implications for respectful maternity care

Affiliations

A scoping review of the impact of organisational factors on providers and related interventions in LMICs: Implications for respectful maternity care

Bhavya Reddy et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

We have limited understanding of the organisational issues at the health facility-level that impact providers and care as it relates to mistreatment in childbirth, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). By extension, it is not clear what types of facility-level organisational changes or changes in working environments in LMICs could support and enable respectful maternity care (RMC). While there has been relatively more attention to health system pressures related to shortages of staff and other resources as key barriers, other organisational challenges may be less explored in the context of RMC. This scoping review aims to consolidate evidence to address these gaps. We searched literature published in English between 2000-2021 within Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect databases. Study selection was two-fold. Maternal health articles articulating an organisational issue at the facility- level and impact on providers and/or care in an LMIC setting were included. We also searched for literature on interventions but due to the limited number of related intervention studies in maternity care specifically, we expanded intervention study criteria to include all medical disciplines. Organisational issues captured from the non-intervention, maternal health studies, and solutions offered by intervention studies across disciplines were organised thematically and to establish linkages between problems and solutions. Of 5677 hits, 54 articles were included: 41 non-intervention maternal healthcare studies and 13 intervention studies across all medical disciplines. Key organisational challenges relate to high workload, unbalanced division of work, lack of professional autonomy, low pay, inadequate training, poor feedback and supervision, and workplace violence, and these were differentially influenced by resource shortages. Interventions that respond to these challenges focus on leadership, supportive supervision, peer support, mitigating workplace violence, and planning for shortages. While many of these issues were worsened by resource shortages, medical and professional hierarchies also strongly underpinned a number of organisational problems. Frontline providers, particularly midwives and nurses, suffer disproportionately and need greater attention. Transforming institutional leadership and approaches to supervision may be particularly useful to tackle existing power hierarchies that could in turn support a culture of respectful care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram for the scoping review process.
If accepted, production will need Fig 1 to link the reader to this figure.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Regional distribution of maternal health articles.
If accepted, production will need Fig 2 to link the reader to the figures.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Distribution of maternal health articles based on type of study.
If accepted, production will need Fig 3 to link the reader to the figures.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Organisational issues and corresponding strategies.
If accepted, production will need Fig 4 to link the reader to this figure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al.. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016. Oct 29;388(10056):2176–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al.. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015. Jun;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, Maung TM, Balde MD, Maya E, et al.. How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. The Lancet. 2019. Nov 9;394(10210):1750–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. d’Orsi E, Brüggemann OM, Diniz CSG, Aguiar JM de, Gusman CR, Torres JA, et al.. Social inequalities and women’s satisfaction with childbirth care in Brazil: a national hospital-based survey. Cad Saude Publica. 2014. Aug;30 Suppl 1:S1–15. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00087813 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, et al.. The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health. 2019. Jun 11;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources