Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 27;2(10):e0001129.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001129. eCollection 2022.

Understanding mechanisms of impact from community-led delivery of HIV self-testing: Mediation analysis of a cluster-randomised trial in Malawi

Affiliations

Understanding mechanisms of impact from community-led delivery of HIV self-testing: Mediation analysis of a cluster-randomised trial in Malawi

Pitchaya P Indravudh et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Community HIV strategies are important for early diagnosis and treatment, with new self-care technologies expanding the types of services that can be led by communities. We evaluated mechanisms underlying the impact of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing (HIVST) using mediation analysis. We conducted a cluster-randomised trial allocating 30 group village heads and their catchment areas to the community-led HIVST intervention in addition to the standard of care (SOC) or the SOC alone. The intervention used participatory approaches to engage established community health groups to lead the design and implementation of HIVST campaigns. Potential mediators (individual perceptions of social cohesion, shared HIV concern, critical consciousness, community HIV stigma) and the outcome (HIV testing in the last 3 months) were measured through a post-intervention survey. Analysis used regression-based models to test (i) intervention-mediator effects, (ii) mediator-outcome effects, and (iii) direct and indirect effects. The survey included 972 and 924 participants in the community-led HIVST and SOC clusters, respectively. The community-led HIVST intervention increased uptake of recent HIV testing, with no evidence of indirect effects from changes in hypothesised mediators. However, standardised scores for community cohesion (adjusted mean difference [MD] 0.15, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.32, p = 0.10) and shared concern for HIV (adjusted MD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.29, p = 0.09) were slightly higher in the community-led HIVST arm than the SOC arm. Social cohesion, community concern, and critical consciousness also apparently had a quadratic association with recent testing in the community-led HIVST arm, with a positive relationship indicated at lower ranges of each score. We found no evidence of intervention effects on community HIV stigma and its association with recent testing. We conclude that the intervention effect mostly operated directly through community-driven service delivery of a novel HIV technology rather than through intermediate effects on perceived community mobilisation and HIV stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Diagram of mediation framework.
HIVST, HIV self-testing. Causal directed acrylic graph of the mediation framework. * Measured at the individual level. † Measured at the cluster level.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Prediction plots of recent HIV testing and potential mediators.
aRR, adjusted risk ratio. Prediction plots with fitted values and 95% CIs. Prediction values obtained from Poisson regression of recent HIV testing on the linear and quadratic terms for the potential mediators, as standardised scores, in the community-led HIV self-testing arm. Fitted values obtained from a quadratic model of prediction values.

References

    1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS Data 2019. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 2019.
    1. Sharma M, Ying R, Tarr G, Barnabas R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of community and facility-based HIV testing to address linkage to care gaps in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature. 2015;528(7580):S77–85. doi: 10.1038/nature16044 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdool Karim SS. HIV-1 Epidemic Control—Insights from Test-and-Treat Trials. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(3):286–8. Epub 2019/07/18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1907279 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Havlir D, Lockman S, Ayles H, Larmarange J, Chamie G, Gaolathe T, et al.. What do the Universal Test and Treat trials tell us about the path to HIV epidemic control? J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(2):e25455. Epub 2020/02/25. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25455 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services for a changing epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO), 2019.

LinkOut - more resources