Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 14;2(11):e0001264.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001264. eCollection 2022.

Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries

Affiliations

Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries

Alexandre Dumont et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Women's fear and uncertainty about vaginal delivery and lack of empowerment in decision-making generate decision conflict and is one of the main determinants of high caesarean section rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to develop a decision analysis tool (DAT) to help pregnant women make an informed choice about the planned mode of delivery and to evaluate its acceptability in Vietnam, Thailand, Argentina, and Burkina Faso. The DAT targets low-risk pregnant women with a healthy, singleton foetus, without any medical or obstetric disorder, no previous caesarean scarring, and eligibility for labour trials. We conducted a systematic review to determine the short- and long-term maternal and offspring risks and benefits of planned caesarean section compared to planned vaginal delivery. We carried out individual interviews and focus group discussions with key informants to capture informational needs for decision-making, and to assess the acceptability of the DAT in participating hospitals. The DAT meets 20 of the 22 Patient Decision Aid Standards for decision support. It includes low- to moderate-certainty evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of both modes of birth, and helps pregnant women clarify their personal values. It has been well accepted by women and health care providers. Adaptations have been made in each country to fit the context and to facilitate its implementation in current practice, including the development of an App. DAT is a simple method to improve communication and facilitate shared decision-making for planned modes of birth. It is expected to build trust and foster more effective, satisfactory dialogue between pregnant women and providers. It can be easily adapted and updated as new evidence emerges. We encourage further studies in LMICs to assess the impact of DAT on quality decision-making for the appropriate use of caesarean section in these settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Decision-analysis tool application for smartphones.

References

    1. Megregian M, Emeis C, Nieuwenhuijze M. The Impact of Shared Decision‐Making in Perinatal Care: A Scoping Review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65: 777–788. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13128 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagner M. Choosing caesarean section. The Lancet. 2000;356: 1677–1680. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03169-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colomar M, Opiyo N, Kingdon C, Long Q, Nion S, Bohren MA, et al.. Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences. Ortiz-Panozo E, editor. PLOS ONE. 2021;16: e0251072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251072 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fioretti B, Reiter M, Betrán A, Torloni M. Googling caesarean section: a survey on the quality of the information available on the Internet. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122: 731–739. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13081 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torloni MR, Daher S, Betran AP, Widmer M, Montilla P, Souza JP, et al.. Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women’s magazines: 20 year review. BMJ. 2011;342: d276–d276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d276 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources