Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 30;3(1):e0000616.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000616. eCollection 2023.

A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care

Affiliations
Review

A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care

Marta Schaaf et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Labouring women may be subjected to physical and verbal abuse that reflects dynamics of power, described as Mistreatment of Women (MoW). This Critical Interpretive Synthesis on power and MoW consolidates current research and advances theory and practice through inter-disciplinary literature exploration. The review was undertaken in 3 phases. Phase 1 consisted of topic scoping; phase 2 entailed exploration of key power-related drivers emerging from the topic scoping; and phase 3 entailed data synthesis and analysis, with a particular focus on interventions. We identified 63 papers for inclusion in Phase 1. These papers utilized a variety of methods and approaches and represented a wide range of geographic regions. The power-related drivers of mistreatment in these articles span multiple levels of the social ecological model, including intrapersonal (e.g. lack of knowledge about one's rights), interpersonal (e.g. patient-provider hierarchy), community (e.g. widespread discrimination against indigenous women), organizational (e.g. pressure to achieve performance goals), and law/policy (e.g. lack of accountability for rights violations). Most papers addressed more than one level of the social-ecological model, though a significant minority were focused just on interpersonal factors. During Phase 1, we identified priority themes relating to under-explored power-related drivers of MoW for exploration in Phase 2, including lack of conscientization and normalization of MoW; perceptions of fitness for motherhood; geopolitical and ethnopolitical projects related to fertility; and pressure to achieve quantifiable performance goals. We ultimately included 104 papers in Phase 2. The wide-ranging findings from Phase 3 (synthesis and analysis) coalesce in several key meta-themes, each with their own evidence-base for action. Consistent with the notion that research on power can point us to "drivers of the drivers," the paper includes some intervention-relevant insights for further exploration, including as relating to broader social norms, health systems design, and the utility of multi-level strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Summary of review phases.

References

    1. Sriram V, Topp SM, Schaaf M, Mishra A, Flores W, Rajasulochana SR, et al.. 10 best resources on power in health policy and systems in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2018. May 1 [cited 2021 May 26];33(4):611–21. Available from: doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gore R, Parker R. Analysing power and politics in health policies and systems. Glob Public Health [Internet]. 2019. Apr 3 [cited 2020 Sep 11];14(4):481–8. Available from: doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1575446 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al.. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2015. Jun 30 [cited 2020 Jul 10];12(6):e1001847. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1... doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erasmus E, Gilson L. How to start thinking about investigating power in the organizational settings of policy implementation. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2008. Sep 1 [cited 2021 Jun 8];23(5):361–8. Available from: doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehmann U, Gilson L. Actor interfaces and practices of power in a community health worker programme: a South African study of unintended policy outcomes. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2013. Jul 1 [cited 2021 Jun 8];28(4):358–66. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/heapol/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/heapol/czs066 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources