Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 24;3(1):e0001512.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001512. eCollection 2023.

A Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of an integrated CHW intervention to address maternal healthcare in rural Nepal

Affiliations

A Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of an integrated CHW intervention to address maternal healthcare in rural Nepal

Aparna Tiwari et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Skilled care during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum is essential to prevent adverse maternal health outcomes, yet utilization of care remains low in many resource-limited countries, including Nepal. Community health workers (CHWs) can mitigate health system challenges and geographical barriers to achieving universal health coverage. Gaps remain, however, in understanding whether evidence-based interventions delivered by CHWs, closely aligned with WHO recommendations, are effective in Nepal's context. We conducted a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation, mixed-methods study in two rural districts in Nepal to evaluate the effectiveness and the implementation of an evidence-based integrated maternal and child health intervention delivered by CHWs, using a mobile application. The intervention was implemented stepwise over four years (2014-2018), with 65 CHWs enrolling 30,785 families. We performed a mixed-effects Poisson regression to assess institutional birth rate (IBR) pre-and post-intervention. We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework to evaluate the implementation during and after the study completion. There was an average 30% increase in IBR post-intervention, adjusting for confounding variables (p<0.0001). Study enrollment showed 35% of families identified as dalit, janjati, or other castes. About 78-89% of postpartum women received at least one CHW-counseled home visit within 60 days of childbirth. Ten (53% of planned) municipalities adopted the intervention during the study period. Implementation fidelity, measured by median counseled home visits, improved with intervention time. The intervention was institutionalized beyond the study period and expanded to four additional hubs, albeit with adjustments in management and supervision. Mechanisms of intervention impact include increased knowledge, timely referrals, and longitudinal CHW interaction. Full-time, supervised, and trained CHWs delivering evidence-based integrated care appears to be effective in improving maternal healthcare in rural Nepal. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence on the role of community health workers in achieving universal health coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: A. Tiwari and A. Thapa are employed by a US-based non-profit (Possible) and based in Nepal. S. Sapkota and R. Khatri are employed by a Nepal-based non-governmental organization, Possible that operates with support from US-based Possible. VB, BB, HJR, R. Paudel, SG, NM, R. Poudel and LDB are employed by a Nepal-based non-governmental organization (Nyaya Health Nepal) that delivers free healthcare in rural Nepal using funds from the Government of Nepal and other public, philanthropic, and private foundation sources. NC, DM, SM are employed by, and SM, DC, DM, and S. Sapkota are faculty members at a private medical school (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai). DM is a member on US-based Possible’s Board of Directors, for which he receives no compensation. IB is a board chair of Nepal-based Possible. WW is a faculty member at a private university (Boston University School of Medicine). DC is a faculty member and SH is a graduate student at a public university (University of Washington). R. Schwarz is employed at an academic medical center (Brigham and Women’s Hospital) that receives public sector research funding, as well as revenue through private sector fee-for-service medical transactions and private foundation grants. R. Schwarz is a faculty member at a private medical school (Harvard Medical School) and employed at an academic medical center (Massachusetts General Hospital) that receives public sector research funding, as well as revenue through private sector fee-for-service medical transactions and private foundation grants. SA is a faculty member at a private medical school (NYU School of Medicine). SK is a nursing student at Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center. IN is a graduate student at a private university (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health). LK is employed by a non-profit (Medic). PT is a graduate student at a public university (University of New South Wales). S. Saud is employed by a government hospital of Nepal (Civil Service Hospital). YKBK is employed by a government hospital of Nepal (COVID Hospital in Shikhar municipality). AB is employed by the local government of Nepal (Amargadhi municipality). R. Shrestha and KRM are employed by a non-profit hospital (Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital). R. Kafle is employed by a Nepal-based non-profit (Nick Simons Institute). GNS is a director of the Nursing and Social Security Division under the Government of Nepal Ministry of Health and Population. All authors declare that we have no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Conceptual model for antenatal and postnatal components of the integrated intervention.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Study enrollment.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Unadjusted institutional birth rates by intervention time period.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Postnatal counseled home visits within 60 days of birth.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Postnatal counseled home visits within a week of birth.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: executive summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 2019. Contract No.: WHO/RHR/19.23.
    1. Lawn JE, Kinney M, Lee AC, Chopra M, Donnay F, Paul VK, et al.. Reducing intrapartum-related deaths and disability: Can the health system deliver? International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2009;107(Supplement):S123–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abeje G, Azage M, Setegn T. Factors associated with Institutional delivery service utilization among mothers in Bahir Dar City administration, Amhara region: a community based cross sectional study. Reproductive health. 2014;11(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teferra AS, Alemu FM, Woldeyohannes SM. Institutional delivery service utilization and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the last 12 months in Sekela District, North West of Ethiopia: A community—based cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-74 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bustreo F, Say L, Koblinsky M, Pullum TW, Temmerman M, Pablos-Méndez A. Ending preventable maternal deaths: the time is now. The Lancet Global Health. 2013;1(4):e176–e7. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70059-7 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources