Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 24;13(1):4856.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31292-6.

A population-based nomogram to individualize treatment modality for pancreatic cancer patients underlying surgery

Affiliations

A population-based nomogram to individualize treatment modality for pancreatic cancer patients underlying surgery

Xiao-Ya Shi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

As the most aggressive tumor, TNM staging does not accurately identify patients with pancreatic cancer who are sensitive to therapy. This study aimed to identify associated risk factors and develop a nomogram to predict survival in pancreatic cancer surgery patients and to select the most appropriate comprehensive treatment regimen. First, the survival difference between radiotherapy and no radiotherapy was calculated based on propensity score matching (PSM). Cox regression was conducted to select the predictors of overall survival (OS). The model was constructed using seven variables: histologic type, grade, T stage, N stage, stage, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. All patients were classified into high- or low-risk groups based on the nomogram. The nomogram model for OS was established and showed good calibration and acceptable discrimination (C-index 0.721). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and DCA curves showed that nomograms had better predictive performance than TNM stage. Patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups according to nomogram scores. Radiotherapy is recommended for high-risk patients but not for low-risk patients. We have established a well-performing nomogram to effectively predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients underlying surgery. The web version of the nomogram https://rockeric.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/ may contribute to treatment optimization in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The data selection steps of the present study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hazard ratio in OS Cox analysis after PSM. OS Overall survival, PSM Propensity score matching, HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval;
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nomogram to estimate the risk of prognosis for pancreatic cancer after surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Calibration curves of the nomogram in the training cohort and validation cohorts. Calibration curves of 1-year (A), 2-year (B), 3-year (C) and 5-year (D) OS for patients in the training and validation cohorts. The plots along the 45° line indicate an appropriate calibration model, in which the predicted probabilities were identical to the actual outcomes. OS Overall survival.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the training and validation cohorts of the nomograms and 7th edition AJCC-TNM staging system for predicting 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS. OS, overall survival.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the training and validation cohorts of the nomograms and 7th edition AJCC-TNM staging system for predicting 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS. OS, overall survival.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Decision curve analysis in the training cohort of the nomograms and 7th edition AJCC-TNM staging system for predicting 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS. OS Overall survival.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients with or without radiotherapy in the low‐risk group; (B) Overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients with or without radiotherapy in the high‐risk group.

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jäger D, Büchler MW. Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019;16:11–26. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0112-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tempero MA. NCCN guidelines updates: Pancreatic cancer. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2019;17:603–605. - PubMed
    1. Kamarajah SK, Burns WR, Frankel TL, Cho CS, Nathan H. Validation of the American joint commission on cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017;24:2023–2030. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5810-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birnbaum DJ, Bertucci F, Finetti P, Birnbaum D, Mamessier E. Head and body/tail pancreatic carcinomas are not the same tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:496. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040497. - DOI - PMC - PubMed