Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;308(1):127-142.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup

Affiliations

Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup

Carlo Ticconi et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: There is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

Methods: In this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extensive diagnostic workup including 44 diagnostic factors divided into 7 major categories.

Results: The rates of abnormalities found were: (1) genital infections: 11.74%; (2) uterine anatomic defects: 23.72%; (3) endocrine disorders: 29.42%; (4) thrombophilias: 62%; (5) autoimmune abnormalities: 39.2%; (6) parental karyotype abnormalities 2.25%; (7) clinical factors: 87.78%. Six hundred and fifty-nine out of eight hundred and forty-three women (78.17%) had more than one abnormality. The mean number of pregnancy losses increased by increasing the number of the abnormalities found (r = 0.86949, P < 0.02). The factors associated with the highest mean number of pregnancy losses were cervical isthmic incompetence, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, unicornuate uterus, anti-prothrombin A antibodies, protein C deficiency, and lupus anticoagulant. The majority of the considered abnormalities had similar, non-significant prevalence between women with 2 versus ≥ 3 pregnancy losses with the exception of age ≥ 35 years and MTHFR A1298C heterozygote mutation. No difference was found between women with primary and secondary RPL stratified according to the number of abnormalities detected (Chi-square: 8.55, P = 0.07). In these women, the only factors found to be present with statistically different rates were age ≥ 35 years, cigarette smoking, and genital infection by Ureaplasma.

Conclusion: A patient-based diagnostic approach in women with RPL could be clinically useful and could represent a basis for future research.

Keywords: Diagnostic factors; Pregnancy complications; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2020) Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 113(3): 533–535. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025 - PubMed
    1. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Guideline of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (2017) ESHRE early pregnancy guideline development group, November, pp 1–153. Available at: https://www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Recurrent-pregnancy...
    1. Vomstein K, Feil K, Strobel L, Aulitzky A, Hofer-Tollinger S, Kuon R-J, Toth B. Immunological risk factors in recurrent pregnancy loss: guidelines versus current state of the art. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):869. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040869. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. El Hachem H, Crepaux V, May-Panloup P, Descamps P, Legendre G, Bouet PE. Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:331–345. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S100817. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alijotas-Reig J, Garrido-Gimenez C. Current concepts and new trends in the diagnosis and management of recurrent miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68(6):445–466. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31828aca19. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types