Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 24;18(1):57.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02220-9.

A focused review of statistical practices for relating radiation dose-volume exposure and toxicity

Andrew M McDonald  1   2 , Craig S Schneider  3 , John M Stahl  3 , Robert A Oster  4 , Richard A Popple  3 , Charles S Mayo  5
Affiliations
Review

A focused review of statistical practices for relating radiation dose-volume exposure and toxicity

Andrew M McDonald et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Relating dose-volume histogram (DVH) information to patient outcomes is critical for outcomes research in radiation oncology, but this is statistically challenging. We performed this focused review of DVH toxicity studies to characterize current statistical approaches and determine the need for updated reporting recommendations.

Methods and materials: We performed a focused MEDLINE search to identify studies published in 5 radiation oncology specialty journals that associated dosimetry with toxicity outcomes in humans receiving radiotherapy between 2015 and 2021. Elements abstracted from each manuscript included the study outcome, organs-at-risk (OARs) considered, DVH parameters analyzed, summary of the analytic approach, use of multivariable statistics, goodness-of-fit reporting, completeness of model reporting, assessment of multicollinearity, adjustment for multiple comparisons, and methods for dichotomizing variables. Each study was also assessed for sufficient reporting to allow for replication of results.

Results: The MEDLINE search returned 2,300 studies for review and 325 met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. DVH variables were dichotomized using cut points in 154 (47.4%) studies. Logistic regression (55.4% of studies) was the most common statistical method used to relate DVH to toxicity outcomes, followed by Cox regression (20.6%) and linear regression (12.0%). Multivariable statistical tests were performed in 226 (69.5%) studies; of these, the possibility of multicollinearity was addressed in 47.8% and model goodness-of-fit were reported in 32.6%. The threshold for statistical significance was adjusted to account for multiple comparisons in 41 of 196 (17.1%) studies that included multiple statistical comparisons. Twenty-eight (8.6%) studies were classified as missing details necessary to reproduce the study results.

Conclusions: Current practices of statistical reporting in DVH outcomes suggest that studies may be vulnerable to threats against internal and external validity. Recommendations for reporting are provided herein to guard against such threats and to promote cohesiveness among radiation oncology outcomes researchers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. McDonald reports grants from National Cancer Institute, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Varian Medical Systems, outside the submitted work. Dr. Popple reports grants from Varian Medical Systems, personal fees from Varian Medical Systems, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Popple has a patent Systems and Methods for Providing Radiotherapy Treatment US Patent Application No. 62/025,165 licensed to Varian Medical Systems. Dr. Schneider, Dr. Stahl, Dr. Oster, and Dr. Mayo have no disclosures.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study inclusion
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jackson A, Yorke ED, Rosenzweig KE. The atlas of complication incidence: a proposal for a new standard for reporting the results of radiotherapy protocols. Seminars Radiation Oncol; 2006: Elsevier. p. 260–8. - PubMed
    1. Jackson A, Marks LB, Bentzen SM, et al. The lessons of QUANTEC: recommendations for reporting and gathering data on dose-volume dependencies of treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:S155–S160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.074. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Surg. 2015;102:148–158. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9736. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thornton H. Report on EQUATOR network launch meeting 26th june 2008 "achieving transparency in reporting health research". Int J Surg (London, England) 2008;6:428–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet. 2007;370:1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. - DOI - PubMed