Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rituximab for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using a Semi-Markovian Model Approach in R
- PMID: 36966699
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.01.011
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rituximab for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using a Semi-Markovian Model Approach in R
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to compare the strategies fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab and fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Brazil.
Methods: A three-states clock-reset semi-Markovian model was constructed in R. The time horizon of the analysis was 15 years and monthly cycles were used. Transition probabilities were derived from the survival curves of the CLL-8 study. Other probabilities were also derived from the medical literature. Costs included in the model referred to the application of injectable drugs, prescription cost, cost of treating adverse events, and costs of supportive care. The model was evaluated by microsimulation. To determine the study result, multiple cost-effectiveness threshold values were used.
Results: In the main analysis, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 19 029.38 PPP-US dollars (USD)/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (41 141.52 Brazilian real/QALY) was observed. In 1.8% of the iterations, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide was considered dominant over fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. It can be shown that at 1 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita/QALY, 36.1% of the iterations would consider the technology cost-effective. At 2 GDP per capita/QALY, this number rises to 82.1%. At 50 000 USD/QALY, 92.8% of the iterations would suggest the technology to be cost-effective. In terms of some threshold accepted or proposed around the world, the technology would be considered cost-effective at 50 000 USD/QALY, 3 GDP per capita/QALY, and 2 GDP per capita/QALY. It would not be cost-effective at 1 GDP per capita/QALY or the opportunity costs threshold.
Conclusion: It can be considered that rituximab is cost-effective for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Brazil.
Keywords: Análise de Sobrevivência; B-Cell; Farmacoeconomia; Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B; Rituximabe; Simulação por Computador; chronic; computer simulation; economics; leukemia; lymphocytic; pharmaceutical; rituximb; survival analysis.
Copyright © 2023 International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rituximab for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: an evidence review of the submission from Roche.Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(Suppl. 2):27-32. doi: 10.3310/hta14suppl2/04. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 21047488 Review.
-
[Economic evaluation of rituximab added to fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia].Gac Sanit. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.03.005. Gac Sanit. 2011. PMID: 21664727 Spanish.
-
Immunosuppressive therapy for progressive idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis in China.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09365-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37046255 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of rituximab in addition to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 May;57(5):1130-9. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1070151. Epub 2015 Nov 20. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016. PMID: 26584689
-
Rituximab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(Suppl. 2):19-26. doi: 10.3310/hta14suppl2/03. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 21047487 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources