Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;166(2):383-393.e13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.01.028. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Effect of donor smoking and substance use on post-lung transplant outcomes

Jesse M Rappaport  1 , Hafiz Umair Siddiqui  1 , Lucy Thuita  2 , Marie Budev  3 , Kenneth R McCurry  4 , Eugene H Blackstone  5 , Usman Ahmad  6 ; Cleveland Clinic Lung Transplantation Center
Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Effect of donor smoking and substance use on post-lung transplant outcomes

Jesse M Rappaport et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to determine effects of donor smoking and substance use on primary graft dysfunction, allograft function, and survival after lung transplant.

Methods: From January 2007 to February 2020, 1366 lung transplants from 1291 donors were performed in 1352 recipients at Cleveland Clinic. Donor smoking and substance use history were extracted from the Uniform Donor Risk Assessment Interview and medical records. End points were post-transplant primary graft dysfunction, longitudinal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% of predicted), and survival.

Results: Among lung transplant recipients, 670 (49%) received an organ from a donor smoker, 163 (25%) received an organ from a donor with a 20 pack-year or more history (median pack-years 8), and 702 received an organ from a donor with substance use (51%). There was no association of donor smoking, pack-years, or substance use with primary graft dysfunction (P > .2). Post-transplant forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 74% at 1 year in donor nonsmoker recipients and 70% in donor smoker recipients (P = .0002), confined to double-lung transplant, where forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 77% in donor nonsmoker recipients and 73% in donor smoker recipients. Donor substance use was not associated with allograft function. Donor smoking was associated with 54% non-risk-adjusted 5-year survival versus 59% (P = .09) and greater pack-years with slightly worse risk-adjusted long-term survival (P = .01). Donor substance use was not associated with any outcome (P ≥ 8).

Conclusions: Among well-selected organs, lungs from smokers were associated with non-clinically important worse allograft outcomes without an inflection point for donor smoking pack-years. Substance use was not associated with worse allograft function. Given the paucity of organs, donor smoking or substance use alone should not preclude assessment for lung donation or transplant.

Keywords: chronic lung allograft dysfunction; primary graft dysfunction; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in