Polymeric prosthetic heart valves: A review of current technologies and future directions
- PMID: 36970335
- PMCID: PMC10034107
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1137827
Polymeric prosthetic heart valves: A review of current technologies and future directions
Abstract
Valvular heart disease is an important source of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Current prosthetic valve replacement options, such as bioprosthetic and mechanical heart valves are limited by structural valve degeneration requiring reoperation or the need for lifelong anticoagulation. Several new polymer technologies have been developed in recent years in the hope of creating an ideal polymeric heart valve substitute that overcomes these limitations. These compounds and valve devices are in various stages of research and development and have unique strengths and limitations inherent to their properties. This review summarizes the current literature available for the latest polymer heart valve technologies and compares important characteristics necessary for a successful valve replacement therapy, including hydrodynamic performance, thrombogenicity, hemocompatibility, long-term durability, calcification, and transcatheter application. The latter portion of this review summarizes the currently available clinical outcomes data regarding polymeric heart valves and discusses future directions of research.
Keywords: aortic valve; heart valve; polymer; polymer valve; transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2023 Singh, Kachel, Castillero, Xue, Kalfa, Ferrari and George.
Conflict of interest statement
IG reports the following disclosures: consultant (honoraria)—Zimmer Biomet, Atricure, Neosurgery, Neptune Medical, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic. Advisory Boards: Edwards Surgical, Medtronic Surgical, Trisol Medical, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Foldax Medical, Zimmer Biomet, Neosurgery, Abbvie, Boston Scientific.Equity: Valcare Medical, Durvena, CardioMech, Vdyne, MitreMedical, MITRx.Institutional funding to Columbia University: Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, JenaValve. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Karen F, Alan G, Greenlund K. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. (2007) 115:e69–e171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.179918, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
