Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 27;14(1):1706.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37428-6.

Soil contamination in nearby natural areas mirrors that in urban greenspaces worldwide

Affiliations

Soil contamination in nearby natural areas mirrors that in urban greenspaces worldwide

Yu-Rong Liu et al. Nat Commun. .

Erratum in

  • Publisher Correction: Soil contamination in nearby natural areas mirrors that in urban greenspaces worldwide.
    Liu YR, van der Heijden MGA, Riedo J, Sanz-Lazaro C, Eldridge DJ, Bastida F, Moreno-Jiménez E, Zhou XQ, Hu HW, He JZ, Moreno JL, Abades S, Alfaro F, Bamigboye AR, Berdugo M, Blanco-Pastor JL, de Los Ríos A, Duran J, Grebenc T, Illán JG, Makhalanyane TP, Molina-Montenegro MA, Nahberger TU, Peñaloza-Bojacá GF, Plaza C, Rey A, Rodríguez A, Siebe C, Teixido AL, Casado-Coy N, Trivedi P, Torres-Díaz C, Verma JP, Mukherjee A, Zeng XM, Wang L, Wang J, Zaady E, Zhou X, Huang Q, Tan W, Zhu YG, Rillig MC, Delgado-Baquerizo M. Liu YR, et al. Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 26;14(1):2405. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37920-z. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 37100778 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Soil contamination is one of the main threats to ecosystem health and sustainability. Yet little is known about the extent to which soil contaminants differ between urban greenspaces and natural ecosystems. Here we show that urban greenspaces and adjacent natural areas (i.e., natural/semi-natural ecosystems) shared similar levels of multiple soil contaminants (metal(loid)s, pesticides, microplastics, and antibiotic resistance genes) across the globe. We reveal that human influence explained many forms of soil contamination worldwide. Socio-economic factors were integral to explaining the occurrence of soil contaminants worldwide. We further show that increased levels of multiple soil contaminants were linked with changes in microbial traits including genes associated with environmental stress resistance, nutrient cycling, and pathogenesis. Taken together, our work demonstrates that human-driven soil contamination in nearby natural areas mirrors that in urban greenspaces globally, and highlights that soil contaminants have the potential to cause dire consequences for ecosystem sustainability and human wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Changes (%) in soil contaminants in urban greenspaces compared with adjacent natural areas worldwide.
A response ratios of (site-level described in Methods) of standardized contaminant indices of metal(loid)s, pesticides, microplastics (MPs), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). B the changes (site-level response ratios, mean ± 95% confidence interval) in the selected soil contaminants within the four categories (i.e., metal(loid)s, pesticides, MPs, and ARGs) and multi-contamination (represented by different colors), comparing urban greenspaces to adjacent natural areas (see Supplementary Fig. 3 for the concentrations of soil contaminants). Multi-contamination represents an average contamination index of standardized four categories of soil contaminants. Complementary figures showing results using an independent approach can be seen in Supplementary Fig. 3, 7 and 10, 11. The maps in the figure were generated using ArcGIS 10.2 software.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The relative importance of socio-economic and environmental factors on the accumulation of soil contaminants.
A structural equation models reveal direct and indirect associations of examined socio-economic (population size and density, human development index (HDI), gross domestic product (GDP)) and environmental factors (climate, plant cover, and soil) with indices of metal(loid)s (n = 112 plots), pesticides (n = 54 plots), microplastics (MPs) (n = 64 plots) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) (n = 112 plots) in the soil accounting for different management practices (irrigated, mowed and fertilized). Numbers adjacent to arrows are indicative of the effect size of the relationship. B the relative importance of examined human and natural factors on the four groups of soil contaminants, based on linear mixed effects model. Orange and green boxes indicate human and natural factors, respectively. MAT mean annual temperature, MAP mean annual precipitation, SOC soil organic carbon, TP total phosphorus, TN total nitrogen. Urban urban greenspaces, Plant plant cover.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Associations between soil contaminants and functional soil microbiome.
A proportions of the genes associated with metal(loid) resistance. Asterisks indicate significant differences between urban and natural ecosystems according to nested PERMANOVA using a block design as described in the Method section. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Detailed statistical results for the PERMANOVA are shown in Supplementary Table 8. B the fitted linear relationships between multi-contamination (standardized between 0 and 1, see Methods) and proportions of the selected functional genes, which are related to stress resistance (black), nutrient cycling (red), pathogenesis (green), and microbial metabolism (blue). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary least squares linear regressions; P < 0.05; n = 32. C a correlation network displaying relationships between soil contaminants and selected functional genes associated with well-known stress resistance, pathogenicity, nutrient cycling and microbial metabolisms. These functional genes were annotated according to BacMet and MG-RAST using metagenomic data (see Methods and Supplementary Table 9). MPs microplastics, ARGs antibiotic resistance genes.

References

    1. UNEP. Global assessment of soil pollution – Summary for policy makers. Rome, FAO (2021).
    1. Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Teksoz K, Durand-Delacre D, Sachs JD. National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nat. Geosci. 2017;10:547–555. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2985. - DOI
    1. Rillig MC, et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Science. 2019;366:886–890. doi: 10.1126/science.aay2832. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Riordan R, Davies J, Stevens C, Quinton JN, Boyko C. The ecosystem services of urban soils: A review. Geoderma. 2021;395:115076. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115076. - DOI
    1. Li G, Sun GX, Ren Y, Luo XS, Zhu YG. Urban soil and human health: a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2018;69:196–215. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12518. - DOI

Publication types