Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 27;13(1):4964.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32070-0.

Brain injury biomarkers do not predict delirium in acutely ill older patients: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Brain injury biomarkers do not predict delirium in acutely ill older patients: a prospective cohort study

Júlio César Garcia de Alencar et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Delirium is a common, serious, and often preventable neuropsychiatric emergency mostly characterized by a disturbance in attention and awareness. Systemic insult and inflammation causing blood-brain-barrier (BBB) damage and glial and neuronal activation leading to more inflammation and cell death is the most accepted theory behind delirium's pathophysiology. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between brain injury biomarkers on admission and delirium in acutely ill older patients. We performed a prospective cohort study which analyzed plasma S100B levels at admission in elderly patients. Our primary outcome was delirium diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were association between S100B, NSE and Tau protein and delirium diagnosis and patients' outcomes (admissions to intensive care, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality). We analyzed 194 patients, and 46 (24%) developed delirium, 25 on admission and 21 during hospital stay. Median of S100B at admission in patients who developed delirium was 0.16 and median was 0.16 in patients who didn't develop delirium (p: 0.69). Levels S100B on admission did not predict delirium in acutely ill elderly patients.Trial registration: The study was approved by the local institutional review board (CAPPESq, no. 77169716.2.0000.0068, October 11, 2017) and registered in Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC, no. RBR-233bct).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study procedures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart illustrating the enrollment of the study population.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oliveira JSL, Berning MJ, Stanich JA, Gerberi DJ, Murad MH, Han JH, et al. Risk factors for delirium in older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2021;78:549–565. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.03.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barron EA, Holmes J. Delirium within the emergency care setting, occurrence and detection: A systematic review. Emerg. Med. J. 2013;30(4):263–268. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200586. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383(9920):911–922. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maldonado JR. Neuropathogenesis of delirium: Review of current etiologic theories and common pathways. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2013;21(12):1190–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.09.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: The confusion assessment method: A new method for detection of delirium. Ann. Intern. Med. 1990;113(12):941–948. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data