Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):172.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03823-3.

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for frailty in patients with diabetes

Affiliations

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for frailty in patients with diabetes

Fan Bu et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty is the third most common complication of diabetes after macrovascular and microvascular complications. The aim of this study was to develop a validated risk prediction model for frailty in patients with diabetes.

Methods: The research used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a dataset representative of the Chinese population. Twenty-five indicators, including socio-demographic variables, behavioral factors, health status, and mental health parameters, were analyzed in this study. The study cohort was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 70 to 30%. LASSO regression analysis was used to screen the variables for the best predictors of the model based on a 10-fold cross-validation. The logistic regression model was applied to explore the associated factors of frailty in patients with diabetes. A nomogram was constructed to develop the prediction model. Calibration curves were applied to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis were conducted to assess predictive performance.

Results: One thousand four hundred thirty-six patients with diabetes from the CHARLS database collected in 2013 (n = 793) and 2015 (n = 643) were included in the final analysis. A total of 145 (10.9%) had frailty symptoms. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that marital status, activities of daily living, waist circumference, cognitive function, grip strength, social activity, and depression as predictors of frailty in people with diabetes. These factors were used to construct the nomogram model, which showed good concordance and accuracy. The AUC values of the predictive model and the internal validation set were 0.912 (95%CI 0.887-0.937) and 0.881 (95% CI 0.829-0.934). Hosmer-Lemeshow test values were P = 0.824 and P = 0.608 (both > 0.05). Calibration curves showed significant agreement between the nomogram model and actual observations. ROC and DCA indicated that the nomogram had a good predictive performance.

Conclusions: Comprehensive nomogram constructed in this study was a promising and convenient tool to evaluate the risk of frailty in patients with diabetes, and contributed clinicians to screening the high-risk population.

Keywords: Diabetic patients; Diabetics; Frailty; Predictive model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Demographic and clinical feature selection using the LASSO regression model. A According to the logarithmic (lambda) sequence, a coefficient profile was generated, and non-zero coefficients were produced by the optimal lambda. B The optimal parameter (lambda) in the LASSO model was selected via tenfold cross-validation using minimum criteria. The partial likelihood deviation (binomial deviation) curve relative to log (lambda) was plotted. A virtual vertical line at the optimal value was drawn using one SE of minimum criterion (the 1-SE criterion)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nomogram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A Nomogram ROC curves generated from the training dataset. B Nomogram ROC curves generated using the validation dataset
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A Calibration plot for the training dataset. B Calibration plot for the validation dataset
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A DCA curves for the training dataset. B DCA curves for the validation dataset

References

    1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ulley J, Abdelhafiz AH. Frailty predicts adverse outcomes in older people with diabetes. Practitioner. 1800;2017(261):17–20. - PubMed
    1. Kirkwood RN, Borem IL, Sampaio RF, et al. Frailty Status and Gait Parameters of Older Women With Type 2 Diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2019;43(2):121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cacciatore F, Testa G, Galizia G, et al. Clinical frailty and long-term mortality in elderly subjects with diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2013;50(2):251–260. doi: 10.1007/s00592-012-0413-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–762. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types