Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 23:17:100603.
doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100603. eCollection 2023 Mar 30.

Residue detection and correlation analysis of multiple neonicotinoid insecticides and their metabolites in edible herbs

Affiliations

Residue detection and correlation analysis of multiple neonicotinoid insecticides and their metabolites in edible herbs

Yudan Wang et al. Food Chem X. .

Abstract

In this work, a green analytical method was established for the simultaneous extraction and detection of 20 analytes-10 neonicotinoid insecticides and their 10 major toxic metabolites in edible herbs. QuEChERS and LC-MS/MS were used to analyze the 20 analytes in five edible herbs. The residues of the 20 neonicotinoid insecticides and their metabolites in 109 herbal samples were detected, of which 90 samples were positive, and the residue of total neonicotinoid insecticides ranged from 0.26 to 139.28 μg/kg. Acetamiprid (77.06 %, ≤85.95 μg/kg), imidacloprid (67.89 %, ≤32.49 μg/kg) and their metabolites (N-desmethyl-acetamiprid (44.04 %, ≤18.42 μg/kg) and desnitro imidacloprid (48.62 %, ≤16.55 μg/kg) were most frequently detected in herbs. Significant positive correlations were found between imidacloprid/acetamiprid and their metabolites in Lycii fructus and Citri reticulatae pericarpium. Therefore, more attention may be given to the neonicotinoid insecticide residues in edible herbs in the future.

Keywords: 1-methyl-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl) guanidium dihydrogen (PubChem CID: 16760148); 1-methyl-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl) urea (PubChem CID: 71346722); 4-trifluoromethylnicotinic acid (PubChem CID: 2777549); 5-hydroxy imidacloprid (PubChem CID: 137177224); 6-chloronicotinic acid (PubChem CID: 79222); Acetamiprid (PubChem CID: 213021); Clothianidin (PubChem CID: 86287519); Desnitro imidacloprid (PubChem CID: 274156523); Dinotefuran (PubChem CID: 100958102); Flonicamid (PubChem CID: 9834513); Flupyradifurone (PubChem CID: 16752772); Herbs; Hydroxy imidacloprid (PubChem CID: 125288315); IMI-olefin (PubChem CID: 14626249); IMI-urea (PubChem CID: 15390532); Imidacloprid (PubChem CID: 86287518); LC-MS/MS; N-desmethyl-acetamiprid (PubChem CID: 11344811); Neonicotinoid insecticides; Nitenpyram (PubChem CID: 3034287); Pesticide residues; QuEChERS; Sulfoxaflor (PubChem CID: 16723172); Thiacloprid (PubChem CID: 115224); Thiamethoxam (PubChem CID: 107646).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Optimization of UFLC-MS/MS conditions: (A) MRM chromatogram; (B) EPI spectra of OH-IMI and 5-OH-IMI; (C) mobile phase composition: 1) acetonitrile–water, 2) acetonitrile–water (5 mM ammonium formate), 3) acetonitrile–water (0.1 % formic acid), 4) acetonitrile–water (0.1 % formic acid and 5 mM ammonium formate).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Optimization of QuEChERS sample preparation (A) extraction solvent; (B) clean-up phase.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Recoveries of NEOs and m-NEOs at three different levels for five matrices (n = 5). (A) Low level; (B) medium level; (C) high level.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The residue concentrations and residue rates of NEOs and m-NEOs in positive samples: (A) residue concentrations; (B) residue rates.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Correlation analysis of NEOs and m-NEOs in (A) Lycii fructus and (B) Citri reticulatae pericarpium.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Correlation analysis of NEOs and m-NEOs in (A) Lycii fructus and (B) Citri reticulatae pericarpium.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdel-Ghany M., Hussein L.A., Azab N.F., El-Khatib A.H., Linscheid M. Simultaneous determination of eight neonicotinoid insecticide residues and two primary metabolites in cucumbers and soil by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry coupled with QuEChERS. Journal of Chromatography B. 2016;1031:15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.06.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Codling G., Naggar Y.A., Giesy J.P., Robertson A.J. Concentrations of neonicotinoid insecticides in honey, pollen and honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in central Saskatchewan, Canada. Chemosphere. 2016;144:2321–2328. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.135. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Document SANTE/12682/2019. (2019). Analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_mrl_gui..., Accessed April 30, 2020.
    1. Gałuszka A., Migaszewski Z., Konieczka P., Namieśnik J. Analytical Eco-Scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2012;37:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.03.013. - DOI
    1. Gao Y., Chu S., Zhang Z., Chen N. Hepataprotective effects of ginsenoside Rg1–A review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2017;206:178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.04.012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources