Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1;110(7):4297-4309.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000064.

Patterns and prognostic values of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and CD8 + T-cell infiltration in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a retrospective analysis of 34 years of National Cancer Center data in China

Affiliations

Patterns and prognostic values of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and CD8 + T-cell infiltration in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a retrospective analysis of 34 years of National Cancer Center data in China

Chaoqi Zhang et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is an extremely rare and highly aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy with a strikingly poor prognosis. Given the great clinical successes of checkpoint immunotherapies, we explored the expression profile and clinical significance of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and CD8 + T cell in SCCE for the first time.

Materials and methods: Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and tumor cells in postoperative, whole tumor sections from 147 SCCE patients were stained for PD-LI expression. We also evaluated each patient's Combined Positive Score (CPS). Multiplex immunofluorescence staining (CD3, CD20, CD68, and PD-L1) was introduced to clarify the location of PD-L1. CD8 density was analyzed by digital imaging and analysis of entire slides. Clinical outcomes were tested for correlations with both PD-L1 expression and CD8 density.

Results: No patients had PD-L1 expressed in their tumor cells. PD-L1 + expression in TIICs was detected in 65 patients (44.2%) and 42 (28.6%) exhibited CPS positivity. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that most of the PD-L1 was expressed on the CD68 + monocytes/macrophages. PD-L1 expression in the TIICs and CPS was found to be correlated with paraffin block age, tumor length, macroscopic type, T stage, and increased overall survival (OS). Expression of PD-L1 in TIICs showed significantly prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS). Increasing CD8 densities were associated with increased PD-L1 expression ( Ptrend <0.0001). Multivariate regression confirmed that PD-L1 in TIICs and CD8 states were independent predictors of OS, and CD8 status were found to be independently predictive of RFS. A stratification based on PD-L1 and CD8 status was also significantly associated with both OS and RFS.

Conclusion: Expression of PD-L1 was only detected in TIICs from approximately half of the patients with SCCEs. In SCCEs, PD-L1 and CD8 status are novel prognostic biomarkers and may inform the implementation of risk-related therapeutic strategies. SCCEs with higher CD8 infiltration also had higher expression of PD-L1, suggesting the development of resistance against adaptive immunity. These findings support the assertion that PD-L1/programmed cell death 1 inhibitors should be investigated in this rare malignancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus. (A) Tumor cells (TCs) in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus did not show any PD-L1 staining. (B) One percent of the tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) showed PD-L1 positive. (C) Fifty percent of the TIICs showed PD-L1 positive. Hematoxylin–eosin staining (upper panel, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm) and PD-L1 staining (middle panel, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; lower panel, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm) of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PD-L1 was mainly located on the CD68+ tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Representative multiple immunofluorescence images of CD68/PD-L1 (A), CD3/PD-L1 (B), CD20/PD-L1 (C), and CD3/CD20/CD68/PD-L1 (D) from tissue microarrays. Left panel, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; right panel, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm. PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CD8+ T-cell infiltration and the association with PD-L1 patterns in SCCE. (A) CD8+ T-cell infiltration in the intratumoral compartment (left panel, ×200) and the peritumoral compartment (right panel, ×200). Scale bars, 50 μm. The distributions of CD8+ T-cell density in SCCEs with or without expression of PD-L1 in TIICs (B) or by CPS (C). (D) PD-L1 expression in TIICs or by CPS increases with increasing CD8 density. (E) The landscape of distributions of CD8 densities and PD-L1 status in SCCE. ****P<0.0001. CPS, Combined Positive Score; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; SCCE, small cell carcinoma of the esophagus; TIIC, tumor-infiltrating immune cell.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlations of PD-L1 and CD8 status and survival in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Relapse-free survival and overall survival in patients with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus according to PD-L1 expression in TIICs (A and B), PD-L1 expression by CPS (C and D), and CD8 status (E and F). CPS, Combined Positive Score; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; TIIC, tumor-infiltrating immune cell.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Survival analysis of the four different immunophenotypes in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus. (A) Representative multiple immunofluorescence images of the four different types (left panel, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; right panel, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm). The Kaplan–Meier curves for relapse-free survival (B) and overall survival (C) in patients with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus according to programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and CD8 status.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li R, Yang Z, Shao F, et al. . Multi-omics profiling of primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus reveals RB1 disruption and additional molecular subtypes. Nat Commun 2021;12:3785. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ku GY, Minsky BD, Rusch VW, et al. . Small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: review of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Ann Oncol 2008;19:533–537. - PubMed
    1. Xu L, Li Y, Liu X, et al. . Treatment strategies and prognostic factors of limited-stage primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Thorac Oncol 2017;12:1834–1844. - PubMed
    1. Hudson E, Powell J, Mukherjee S, et al. . Small cell oesophageal carcinoma: an institutional experience and review of the literature. Br J Cancer 2007;96:708–711. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song Z, Liu Y, Cheng G, et al. . Distinct mutational backgrounds and clonal architectures implicated prognostic discrepancies in small-cell carcinomas of the esophagus and lung. Cell Death Dis 2021;12:472. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms