Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;70(6):e30319.
doi: 10.1002/pbc.30319. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

Gene therapy in sickle cell disease: Attitudes and informational needs of patients and caregivers

Affiliations

Gene therapy in sickle cell disease: Attitudes and informational needs of patients and caregivers

Akshay Sharma et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder that results in serious morbidity and early mortality. Novel therapies for SCD, most notably genetic therapies (GTs) and HLA-mismatched donor hematopoietic cell transplantation, are in clinical trials. While potentially curative, these interventions are some of the most intensive treatments for SCD and are associated with serious and life-altering side effects, which may manifest several years after treatment. Little is known about knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of individuals with SCD, or their caregivers, toward existing and these emerging therapies.

Methods: Patients with SCD at least 13 years of age (n = 66) and caregivers (n = 38) were surveyed about knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs surrounding treatments for SCD.

Results: Only 4.8% felt "extremely knowledgeable" about GT for SCD while the majority (63.4%) reported little knowledge. Overall, health literacy was low among respondents. Most respondents had a neutral attitude regarding the safety of GT for SCD, and whether it was a good treatment for the disorder (56.7% and 58.6%, respectively). Only a few respondents endorsed the idea that GT was "unsafe" or "not a good treatment" (5.8% and 4.8%, respectively). There was an association between increasing knowledge about GT and agreement that it is safe (p = .012) and a good treatment for SCD (p = .031).

Conclusions: Given that very few patients with SCD feel knowledgeable about GT and a majority have neutral feelings about the safety and utility of this new approach, culturally appropriate patient-centered education is urgently needed as these treatments get regulatory approval and proceed to the clinic.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03745287 NCT04443907 NCT05456880.

Keywords: gene therapy; hematology/oncology; patient education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

Dr. Akshay Sharma (AS) is the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital site principal investigator of clinical trials for genome editing of sickle cell disease sponsored by Vertex Pharmaceuticals / CRISPR Therapeutics (NCT03745287), Novartis (NCT04443907) and Beam Therapeutics (NCT05456880). The industry sponsors provided funding for the clinical trial, which includes salary support paid to AS’s institution. AS has received consultant fee from Spotlight Therapeutics, Medexus Inc. Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Sangamo Therapeutics and Editas Medicine. AS has also received research funding from CRISPR Therapeutics and honoraria from Vindico Medical Education.

Dr. Jane Hankins receives Consultancy fees for Global Blood Therapeutics and CVS Health.

The remaining authors have no relevant conflicts of interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Self-Reported Knowledge About Gene Therapy, Bone Marrow Transplantation, and Hydroxyurea as Potential Treatments for Sickle Cell Disease
Using a five-point Likert Scale, participants were asked to report their knowledge of two potentially curative treatments for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) alongside a commonly available disease-modifying therapy (Hydroxyurea). Self-reported knowledge about Hydroxyurea therapy for SCD was significantly greater than for either bone marrow transplantation or gene therapy (P < 0.0001, for both comparisons).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Participant Assessment of Safety and Utility of Various Treatments for Sickle Cell Disease
Using a five-point Likert Scale, participants were asked to rate the safety and utility of two potentially curative treatments for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) (Gene Therapy, Bone Marrow Treatment) alongside two commonly utilized disease-modifying interventions (Hydroxyurea and Chronic Blood Transfusion Therapy).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Impact of Potential Treatment Risks and Benefits on Participant Willingness to Undergo Gene Therapy or Bone Marrow Transplant
Figure 3A depicts the likelihood of potential therapy-related side effects on one’s decision to undergo gene therapy (GT) or bone marrow transplant (BMT), while Figure 3B depicts the impact of potential treatment benefits on one’s decision to undergo GT or BMT. Significant p-values (P < 0.05) are included when applicable.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Impact of Psychosocial Factors on Participant Willingness to Undergo Gene Therapy or Bone Marrow Transplant
The potential impact of external psycho-social factors influencing a respondent’s decision to undergo gene therapy (GT) or bone marrow transplant (BMT). Significant p-values (p < 0.05) are included when applicable.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:. Association Between Participant Characteristics and Beliefs about Gene Therapy, Bone Marrow Transplantation, and Hydroxyurea as Treatment for Sickle Cell Disease Measured by Goodman and Kruskal’s Gamma coefficient (γ)
The figure displays the results of an association analysis (Goodman and Kruskal’s Gamma) looking at the relationship between participant characteristics and their beliefs about gene therapy (GT), bone marrow transplant (BMT), and Hydroxyurea (HU) as interventions for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD). Significant associations are indicated with one asterisk (*) for p < 0.05 and two asterisks (**) for p < 0.001. See results for full explanation of the significant associations.

References

    1. Brousseau DC, Panepinto JA, Nimmer M, Hoffmann RG. The number of people with sickle-cell disease in the United States: national and state estimates. Am J Hematol, 2010. 85: 77–78. - PubMed
    1. Hassell KL. Population Estimates of Sickle Cell Disease in the U.S. Am J Prev Med, 2010. 38: S512–S521. - PubMed
    1. Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees DC. Sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med, 2017. 376: 1561–1573. - PubMed
    1. Hamideh D, Alvarez O. Sickle cell disease related mortality in the United States (1999–2009). Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2013. 60: 1482–1486. - PubMed
    1. Lanzkron S, Patrick Carroll C, Haywood C. Mortality rates and age at death from sickle cell disease: U.S., 1979–2005 [Internet]. Public Health Rep, 2013. 128: 110–116. [cited 2021 Dec 19] Available from: 10.1177/003335491312800206 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources