Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 7;30(3):3111-3137.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030236.

Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Affiliations
Review

Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Christos Tsalikidis et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most severe complications following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Indeed, leaks that may occur after any type of intestinal anastomosis are commonly associated with a higher reoperation rate and an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. At first, our review aims to identify specific preoperative, intraoperative and perioperative factors that eventually lead to the development of anastomotic dehiscence based on the current literature. We will also investigate the role of several biomarkers in predicting the presence of ALs following colorectal surgery. Despite significant improvements in perioperative care, advances in surgical techniques, and a high index of suspicion of this complication, the incidence of AL remained stable during the last decades. Thus, gaining a better knowledge of the risk factors that influence the AL rates may help identify high-risk surgical patients requiring more intensive perioperative surveillance. Furthermore, prompt diagnosis of this severe complication may help improve patient survival. To date, several studies have identified predictive biomarkers of ALs, which are most commonly associated with the inflammatory response to colorectal surgery. Interestingly, early diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of this complication may offer a significant opportunity to guide clinical judgement and decision-making.

Keywords: anastomotic leakage; anastomotic leakage prediction; colorectal cancer; colorectal surgery; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multiple risk factors have been investigated so far concerning their impact on the incidence of postoperative ALs. Gaining a better knowledge of certain preoperative, intraoperative and perioperative factors could assist the surgeons’ intraoperative judgement and decision-making.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative assessment of anastomotic perfusion using ICG-FA in order to construct a well-vascularized anastomosis (white arrows) and reduce the risk of postoperative AL. ICG-FA, indocyanine green-fluorescence angiography; AL, anastomotic leakage.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lauby-Secretan B., Vilahur N., Bianchini F., Guha N., Straif K., International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group The IARC Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1734–1740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1714643. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Branagan G., Finnis D., Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group Prognosis after Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1021–1026. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0869-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mirnezami A., Mirnezami R., Chandrakumaran K., Sasapu K., Sagar P., Finan P. Increased Local Recurrence and Reduced Survival from Colorectal Cancer Following Anastomotic Leak: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Surg. 2011;253:890–899. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phillips B. Reducing Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leak Rates: Review of Challenges and Solutions. Open Access Surg. 2016;5:5–14. doi: 10.2147/OAS.S54936. - DOI