Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;11(3):68.
doi: 10.3390/dj11030068.

Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners

Affiliations

Chewing Efficiency Test in Subjects with Clear Aligners

Luca Levrini et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the masticatory function of subjects with clear aligners and to propose a simple and repeatable method for the clinical and experimental evaluation of masticatory function. For the testing we used almonds, a natural substance that can be easily found and stored, has intermediate consistency and hardness, is insoluble in saliva, and has the ability easily lose the moisture absorbed in the mouth. Thirty-four subjects using the Invisalign® (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) protocol were randomly selected. This was an "intercontrol test", i.e., all subjects under the same conditions acted as controls but also as cases whilst wearing the clear aligners. Patients were asked to chew an almond for 20 s, once with aligners and once without aligners. The material was then dried, sieved, and weighted. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate any significative differences. In all our subjects, the efficiency of chewing with clear aligners was found to be comparable to the efficiency of chewing without clear aligners. In detail, the average weight after drying was 0.62 g without aligners and 0.69 g with aligners, while after sieving at 1 mm, the average weight was 0.08 g without aligners and 0.06 g with aligners. The average variation after drying was of 12%, and after sieving at 1 mm, it was 25%. In summary, there was no substantial difference between chewing with or without clear aligners. Despite some discomfort in chewing, the clear aligners were well tolerated by most subjects, who wore them without difficulty even during meals.

Keywords: clear aligners; mastication; masticatory efficiency; oral function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Precision scale and sieve used to collect and weight the specimens.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph of the average of the weights obtained.

References

    1. Alshammari A., Almotairy N., Kumar A., Grigoriadis A. Effect of malocclusion on jaw motor function and chewing in children: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022;26:2335–2351. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04356-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edlund J., Lamm C.J. Masticatory efficiency. J. Oral Rehabil. 1980;7:123–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00428.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Abreu R.A., Pereira M.D., Furtado F., Prado G.P., Mestriner W., Jr., Ferreira L.M. Masticatory efficiency and bite force in individuals with normal occlusion. Arch. Oral Biol. 2014;59:1065–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shim J., Ho K.C.J., Shim B.C., Metaxas A., Somogyi-Ganss E., Di Sipio R., Cioffi I. Impact of post-orthodontic dental occlusion on masticatory performance and chewing efficiency. Eur. J. Orthod. 2020;42:587–595. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz095. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akeel R., Nilner M., Nilner K. Masticatory efficiency in individuals with natural dentition. Swed. Dent. J. 1992;16:191–198. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources