Multicenter evaluation of the Quantra with the QStat Cartridge in adult patients undergoing liver transplantation
- PMID: 36976255
- PMCID: PMC10578515
- DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000138
Multicenter evaluation of the Quantra with the QStat Cartridge in adult patients undergoing liver transplantation
Abstract
Blood loss and transfusion of blood products are key concerns during liver transplantation. Whole-blood viscoelastic testing devices have been used to monitor hemostatic function and guide the transfusion of blood products in this patient population. The Quantra System with the QStat Cartridge is a new point-of-care, closed-system viscoelastic testing device that measures changes in clot stiffness during coagulation and fibrinolysis using ultrasound detection of resonance. The aim of this multicenter prospective observational study was to evaluate the Quantra System against the ROTEM delta device in monitoring coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation. One hundred twenty-five (125) adult subjects (above 18 y old) were enrolled across 5 medical centers in the US. Blood samples were collected at a minimum of 3-time points: preincision (baseline), during the anhepatic phase, and after the start of reperfusion. Performance was assessed as the correlation of equivalent measurements from the QStat Cartridge and ROTEM delta INTEM, EXTEM, and FIBTEM assays. In addition, a clinical concordance analysis was performed to assess the agreement between the 2 devices related to the detection of fibrinolysis. The correlation between the 2 viscoelastic testing devices was strong, with r -values ranging between 0.88 and 0.95, and the overall agreement with respect to detecting fibrinolysis was 90.3% (CI, 86.9%-93.2%). The results indicate that the Quantra with the QStat Cartridge provides comparable information as the ROTEM delta in the assessment of hemostatic function during a liver transplant. Quantra's simplicity of use and availability of rapid results may provide clinicians with a faster, more convenient means to assess coagulation and fibrinolysis status in the operating room and critical care setting.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Antolin S. Flores received grants from Hemosonics. He consults for Werfen. Katherine T. Forkin received grants from Hemosonics. Sathish S. Kumar received grants from Edwards Life Sciences, Hemosonics, and PCORI. Deborah A. Winegar is employed by Hemosonics. Francesco Viola is employed by Hemosonics. Meghan M. Brennan has no conflicts to report.
Figures


Comment in
-
Quantra: A step forward in intraoperative coagulation management, or just the same old test?Liver Transpl. 2023 Nov 1;29(11):1149-1150. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000192. Epub 2023 Jun 27. Liver Transpl. 2023. PMID: 37358481 No abstract available.
References
-
- Becker RC. Cell-based models of coagulation: a paradigm in evolution. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005;20:65–8. - PubMed
-
- Gaertner F, Massberg S. Blood coagulation in immunothrombosis—at the frontline of intravascular immunity. Semin Immunol. 2016;28:561–9. - PubMed
-
- Tripodi A, Mannucci PM. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:147–56. - PubMed
-
- Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, Lisman T, Macik BG, Northup PG, Reddy KR, et al. . Coagulation disorders and hemostasis in liver disease: pathophysiology and critical assessment of current management. Hepatology. 2006;44:1039–46. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical