Response Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapies in Sarcoma
- PMID: 36976453
- DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01075-2
Response Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapies in Sarcoma
Abstract
Sarcoma is a complex and heterogeneous disease with a rapidly evolving treatment landscape. With a growing emphasis on neoadjuvant therapy as a way to improve surgical and oncologic outcomes, our approach to monitor treatment efficacy must also continue to evolve. This is paramount to both clinical trial design, where endpoints must accurately reflect disease outcomes, and individual patient, whose treatment response informs therapeutic decisions. In the era of personalized medicine, the response to neoadjuvant treatment in sarcoma remains most effectively gauged by pathologic review following surgical resection. Although measures of pathologic complete response most effectively predict outcome, the requisite surgical excision precludes their use in real-time monitoring of neoadjuvant treatment response. Current image-based metrics such as RECIST and PERCIST have been utilized in many trials; however, they are limited by their unilateral measurement approach. More effective tools are needed to better measure the response to therapy prior to neoadjuvant regimen completion, so that the medication or regimen may be best tailored to patient response in an ongoing fashion. Delta-radiomics and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represent promising novel tools for real-time monitoring of treatment efficacy. These metrics have been shown to predict pathologic complete response and disease progression at a superior level to traditional CT-based guidelines. Delta-radiomics is currently being utilized in a clinical trial among soft tissue sarcoma patients in which radiation dosage is adjusted based on radiomic data. The ability of ctDNA to detect molecular residual disease is also under study in multiple clinical trials, although none in the field of sarcoma. Future directions in the field include the use of ctDNA and molecular residual disease testing among sarcoma patients, as well as increased utilization of delta-radiomics, to more effectively monitor neoadjuvant treatment response prior to surgical resection.
Keywords: Delta-radiomics; Neoadjuvant radiation; Sarcoma; Soft tissue sarcoma.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
-
- Gamboa AC, Gronchi A. Cardona K 2020 Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: an update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2020;70(3):200–29. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21605 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Grünewald TG, Alonso M, Avnet S, et al. Sarcoma treatment in the era of molecular medicine. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12(11). https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201911131
-
- Gronchi A, Lo Vullo S, Colombo C, et al. Extremity soft tissue sarcoma in a series of patients treated at a single institution: local control directly impacts survival. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):506–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf87fa . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Trovik CS, Bauer HCF, Alvegard TA, et al. Surgical margins, local recurrence and metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas: 559 surgically-treated patients from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Register. Eur J Cancer. 2000;2000(36):710–6. - DOI
-
- Gronchi A, Ferrari S, Quagliuolo V, et al. Histotype-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in patients with high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (ISG-STS 1001): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(6):812–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30334-0 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources