Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;8(Suppl 1):e010726.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010726.

Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services

Affiliations

Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services

Kristen Danforth et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Essential packages of health services (EPHS) are a critical tool for achieving universal health coverage, especially in low-income and lower middle-income countries. However, there is a lack of guidance and standards for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of EPHS implementation. This paper is the final in a series of papers reviewing experiences using evidence from the Disease Control Priorities, third edition publications in EPHS reforms in seven countries. We assess current approaches to EPHS M&E, including case studies of M&E approaches in Ethiopia and Pakistan. We propose a step-by-step process for developing a national EPHS M&E framework. Such a framework would start with a theory of change that links to the specific health system reforms the EPHS is trying to accomplish, including explicit statements about the 'what' and 'for whom' of M&E efforts. Monitoring frameworks need to consider the additional demands that could be placed on weak and already overstretched data systems, and they must ensure that processes are put in place to act quickly on emergent implementation challenges. Evaluation frameworks could learn from the field of implementation science; for example, by adapting the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework to policy implementation. While each country will need to develop its own locally relevant M&E indicators, we encourage all countries to include a set of core indicators that are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goal 3 targets and indicators. Our paper concludes with a call to reprioritise M&E more generally and to use the EPHS process as an opportunity for strengthening national health information systems. We call for an international learning network on EPHS M&E to generate new evidence and exchange best practices.

Keywords: health policy; health systems evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sample questions or tracer indicators based on theories of change for essential packages of health services (EPHS) reform. PHC, primary health care.

References

    1. Waddington C. Essential health packages. What are they for. 2013.
    1. Watkins DA, Dean T J, Anne M, et al. In: Disease control priorities: improving health and reducing poverty. Jamison DT, editor. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2017. Universal haealth coverage and essential packages of care. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glassman A, Giedion U, Sakuma Y, et al. Defining a health benefits package: what are the necessary processes? Health Syst Reform . 2016;2:39–50. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1124171. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas JC, Doherty K, Watson-Grant S, et al. Advances in monitoring and evaluation in low- and middle-income countries. Eval Program Plann. 2021;89:101994. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101994. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine . Essential health benefits: balancing coverage and cost. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. p. 256.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources