Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 15;11(3):915.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030915.

Unlocking the Pragmatic Potential of Regenerative Therapies in Heart Failure with Next-Generation Treatments

Affiliations
Review

Unlocking the Pragmatic Potential of Regenerative Therapies in Heart Failure with Next-Generation Treatments

Yoshikazu Kishino et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) have a poor prognosis due to irreversible impairment of left ventricular function, with 5-year survival rates <60%. Despite advances in conventional medicines for HF, prognosis remains poor, and there is a need to improve treatment further. Cell-based therapies to restore the myocardium offer a pragmatic approach that provides hope for the treatment of HF. Although first-generation cell-based therapies using multipotent cells (bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells, mesenchymal stem cells, adipose-derived regenerative cells, and c-kit-positive cardiac cells) demonstrated safety in preclinical models of HF, poor engraftment rates, and a limited ability to form mature cardiomyocytes (CMs) and to couple electrically with existing CMs, meant that improvements in cardiac function in double-blind clinical trials were limited and largely attributable to paracrine effects. The next generation of stem cell therapies uses CMs derived from human embryonic stem cells or, increasingly, from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). These cell therapies have shown the ability to engraft more successfully and improve electromechanical function of the heart in preclinical studies, including in non-human primates. Advances in cell culture and delivery techniques promise to further improve the engraftment and integration of hiPSC-derived CMs (hiPSC-CMs), while the use of metabolic selection to eliminate undifferentiated cells will help minimize the risk of teratomas. Clinical trials of allogeneic hiPSC-CMs in HF are now ongoing, providing hope for vast numbers of patients with few other options available.

Keywords: CM; cardiomyocyte; heart failure; hiPSC; human-induced pluripotent stem cell; iPSC; induced pluripotent stem cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K.F. is a co-founder and the CEO of Heartseed, Inc.; Y.K. declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mechanism of action of next-generation cell therapies versus first-generation cell therapies. In contrast to first-generation therapies, which are largely limited to paracrine effects, next-generation therapies aim to promote remuscularization of the heart. BM-MNC, bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell; CM, cardiomyocyte; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; hiPSC-CM, human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte; LV, left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; miRNA, micro ribonucleic acid; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor-1; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of implantation methods and devices for engrafting hiPSC-CMs. hiPSC, human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex coronary artery; LV, left ventricle; RCA, right coronary artery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of the scalable manufacturing of clinical-grade hiPSC-CMs. CM, cardiomyocyte; hiPSC, human-induced pluripotent stem cell; hiPSC-CM, human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte; w/o, without.

References

    1. Savarese G., Becher P.M., Lund L.H., Seferovic P., Rosano G.M.C., Coats A.J.S. Global burden of heart failure: A comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022;118:3272–3287. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mosterd A., Hoes A.W. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure. Heart. 2007;93:1137–1146. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.025270. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calvert M.J., Freemantle N., Cleland J.G.F. The impact of chronic heart failure on health-related quality of life data acquired in the baseline phase of the CARE-HF study. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2005;7:243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.01.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mamas M.A., Sperrin M., Watson M.C., Coutts A., Wilde K., Burton C., Kadam U.T., Kwok C.S., Clark A.B., Murchie P., et al. Do patients have worse outcomes in heart failure than in cancer? A primary care-based cohort study with 10-year follow-up in Scotland. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2017;19:1095–1104. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.822. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones N.R., Roalfe A.K., Adoki I., Hobbs F.D.R., Taylor C.J. Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2019;21:1306–1325. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1594. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding