Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 19;11(6):887.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.

ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns

Malik Sallam  1   2
Affiliations
Review

ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns

Malik Sallam. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based conversational large language model (LLM). The potential applications of LLMs in health care education, research, and practice could be promising if the associated valid concerns are proactively examined and addressed. The current systematic review aimed to investigate the utility of ChatGPT in health care education, research, and practice and to highlight its potential limitations. Using the PRIMSA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted to retrieve English records in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar (published research or preprints) that examined ChatGPT in the context of health care education, research, or practice. A total of 60 records were eligible for inclusion. Benefits of ChatGPT were cited in 51/60 (85.0%) records and included: (1) improved scientific writing and enhancing research equity and versatility; (2) utility in health care research (efficient analysis of datasets, code generation, literature reviews, saving time to focus on experimental design, and drug discovery and development); (3) benefits in health care practice (streamlining the workflow, cost saving, documentation, personalized medicine, and improved health literacy); and (4) benefits in health care education including improved personalized learning and the focus on critical thinking and problem-based learning. Concerns regarding ChatGPT use were stated in 58/60 (96.7%) records including ethical, copyright, transparency, and legal issues, the risk of bias, plagiarism, lack of originality, inaccurate content with risk of hallucination, limited knowledge, incorrect citations, cybersecurity issues, and risk of infodemics. The promising applications of ChatGPT can induce paradigm shifts in health care education, research, and practice. However, the embrace of this AI chatbot should be conducted with extreme caution considering its potential limitations. As it currently stands, ChatGPT does not qualify to be listed as an author in scientific articles unless the ICMJE/COPE guidelines are revised or amended. An initiative involving all stakeholders in health care education, research, and practice is urgently needed. This will help to set a code of ethics to guide the responsible use of ChatGPT among other LLMs in health care and academia.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; digital health; ethics; healthcare; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the record selection process based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of the types of included records (n = 60). Preprints (not peer reviewed) are highlighted in grey while published records are highlighted in blue.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Summary of benefits/applications of ChatGPT in health care education, research, and practice based on the included records.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of risks/concerns of ChatGPT use in health care education, research, and practice based on the included records.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sarker I.H. AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems. SN Comput. Sci. 2022;3:158. doi: 10.1007/s42979-022-01043-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Korteling J.E., van de Boer-Visschedijk G.C., Blankendaal R.A.M., Boonekamp R.C., Eikelboom A.R. Human- versus Artificial Intelligence. Front. Artif. Intell. 2021;4:622364. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.622364. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy J., Minsky M.L., Rochester N., Shannon C.E. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Mag. 2006;27:12. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904. - DOI
    1. Jordan M.I., Mitchell T.M. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science. 2015;349:255–260. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8415. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Domingos P. The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. 1st ed. Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group; New York, NY, USA: 2018. p. 329.