Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 20;11(6):892.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060892.

The Impact of Event Scale-Revised: Examining Its Cutoff Scores among Arab Psychiatric Patients and Healthy Adults within the Context of COVID-19 as a Collective Traumatic Event

Affiliations

The Impact of Event Scale-Revised: Examining Its Cutoff Scores among Arab Psychiatric Patients and Healthy Adults within the Context of COVID-19 as a Collective Traumatic Event

Amira Mohammed Ali et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) is the most popular measure of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It has been recently validated in Arabic. This instrumental study aimed to determine optimal cutoff scores of the IES-R and its determined six subscales in Arab samples of psychiatric patients (N = 168, 70.8% females) and healthy adults (N = 992, 62.7% females) from Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic as a probable ongoing collective traumatic event. Based on a cutoff score of 14 of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 8-items (DASS-8), receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis revealed two optimal points of 39.5 and 30.5 for the IES-R in the samples (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86 & 0.91, p values = 0.001, 95% CI: 0.80-0.92 & 0.87-0.94, sensitivity = 0.85 & 0.87, specificity = 0.73 & 0.83, Youden index = 0.58 & 0.70, respectively). Different cutoffs were detected for the six subscales of the IES-R, with numbing and avoidance expressing the lowest predictivity for distress. Meanwhile, hyperarousal followed by pandemic-related irritability expressed a stronger predictive capacity for distress than all subscales in both samples. In path analysis, pandemic-related irritability/dysphoric mood evolved as a direct and indirect effect of key PTSD symptoms (intrusion, hyperarousal, and numbing). The irritability dimension of the IES-R directly predicted the traumatic symptoms of sleep disturbance in both samples while sleep disturbance did not predict irritability. The findings suggest the usefulness of the IES-R at a score of 30.5 for detecting adults prone to trauma related distress, with higher scores needed for screening in psychiatric patients. Various PTSD symptoms may induce dysphoric mood, which represents a considerable burden that may induce circadian misalignment and more noxious psychiatric problems/co-morbidities (e.g., sleep disturbance) in both healthy and diseased groups.

Keywords: Arabic version/Arab/Saudi Arabia; Coronavirus Disease-19/COVID-19; Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R); cutoff point/cutoff score; post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); psychiatric or mental disorders/patients/the general public/healthy adults; psychometric evaluation/criterion validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using the scores of the Arabic version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and its subscales to classify people with mental disorders (a) and healthy adults (b) according to their self-reported level of distress as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 8 (DASS-8).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model quality of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses which used the Arabic version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and its subscales to predict psychological distress among people with mental disorders (a) and healthy adults (b).

References

    1. Qiu J., Shen B., Zhao M., Wang Z., Xie B., Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. Gen. Psychiatr. 2020;33:e100213. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang C., Pan R., Wan X., Tan Y., Xu L., McIntyre R.S., Choo F.N., Tran B., Ho R., Sharma V.K., et al. A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;87:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.028. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagarajan R., Krishnamoorthy Y., Basavarachar V., Dakshinamoorthy R. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder among survivors of severe COVID-19 infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2022;299:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Amer R., Malak M.Z., Burqan H.M.R., Stănculescu E., Nalubega S., Alkhamees A.A., Hendawy A.O., Ali A.M. Emotional Reaction to the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine: Postvaccination Decline in Anxiety and Stress among Anxious Individuals and Increase among Individuals with Normal Prevaccination Anxiety Levels. J. Pers. Med. 2022;12:912. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060912. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chew Q.H., Wei K.C., Vasoo S., Chua H.C., Sim K. Narrative synthesis of psychological and coping responses towards emerging infectious disease outbreaks in the general population: Practical considerations for the COVID-19 pandemic. Singap. Med. J. 2020;61:350. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources