Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Mar 13;20(6):5046.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065046.

Realfood and Cancer: Analysis of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Content

Affiliations
Observational Study

Realfood and Cancer: Analysis of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Content

Sergio Segado-Fernández et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This study analyzes the quality and reliability of videos related to nutrition and cancer on YouTube.

Study design: An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, time-limited study analyzing activity on the social network YouTube was proposed.

Methods: The information from the videos was extracted through an API search tool, using the NodeXL software. The criteria to select the videos on YouTube were the keywords "real food", "realfood", and "cancer" and the hashtags #realfood and #cancer were present, videos in English and videos available on 1 December 2022.

Results: The DISCERN value in the total number of videos viewed was 2.25 (±0.88) points, indicating low reliability. The videos uploaded by HRU represented only 20.8%. Videos suggesting that the use of foods defined as "real food" could cure cancer without the intervention of any other treatment accounted for 12.5%. Videos that provided external links to scientific/technical evidence verifying the information represented only 13.89% of the total number of videos. Of these videos, 70% corresponded to HRU. The DISCERN value for videos from HRU users was 3.05 (0.88), a value that reflects a good reliability of videos from these users.

Conclusions: This study provides information on the content and quality of the videos that we can find on YouTube. We found videos of non-health users who do not base their content on any scientific evidence, with the danger that this entails for the population, but it also highlights that the videos published by HRU have greater reliability and quality, being better perceived by the population, so it is important to encourage healthcare professionals and health institutions to share verified information on YouTube.

Keywords: cancer; detection; diet; health misinformation; healthcare professionals; public health; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision flow chart, based on PRISMA flowchart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giaquinto A.N., Sung H., Miller K.D., Kramer J.L., Newman L.A., Minihan A. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:524–541. doi: 10.3322/caac.21754. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO The top 10 Causes of Death. [(accessed on 5 January 2023)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.
    1. Ruco A., Dossa F., Tinmouth J., Llovet D., Jacobson J., Kishibe T. Social Media and mHealth Technology for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021;23:e26759. doi: 10.2196/26759. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Tomorrow. [(accessed on 5 January 2023)]. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/en/dataviz/isotype?types=0&sexes=0&mode=pop....
    1. Stiles B.M., Mynard J.N. Social Media and Your Cancer Patient. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2021;33:517–521. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.12.014. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types